HighFlyingA380
Regular Member
I'm a pilot, and I'm all for them getting rid of the program. Only, of course, because I think everybody should be able to carry a gun on planes.
I'm a pilot, and I'm all for them getting rid of the program. Only, of course, because I think everybody should be able to carry a gun on planes.
Since we can't, let's keep the program. Ok by you?
While I see a value in security on flights, I would prefer the pilot be flying the plane, a heavy duty metal door will suffice to keep the pilot flying the plane.
I fly those planes and have yet to see a "heavy duty metal door" in any of them. Yes, they lock and are bullet resistant. That in no way means a determined person or people can't gain entry in a short time.
There are other design and procedural shortcomings in that environment that aren't appropriate to talk about publicly that can be at least addressed by an armed person on the flight deck.
Planes are cramped areas, and discharging a firearm at close range has a host of issues, one is over-penetration. I am not sure about anyone else but I don't want some pilot carrying a firearm firing it--not to mention a pilot who may not be trained to retain the firearm, and loses it to some terrorist or nut-job during a fight for control. It cramped areas like that, hand to hand combat is the best option. The pilot wants to carry something, a knife that he is trained to use proficiently; not that a knife fight doesn't have it's downsides.
Planes are cramped areas, and discharging a firearm at close range has a host of issues, one is over-penetration. I am not sure about anyone else but I don't want some pilot carrying a firearm firing it--not to mention a pilot who may not be trained to retain the firearm, and loses it to some terrorist or nut-job during a fight for control.
It doesn't matter how 'heavy duty' the door is; Since they don't re-enforce the walls on either side of the door, what good is it? With most transport category aircraft with lavatories right behind the cockpit, you can kick your foot through the wall and circuit panel. A bullet won't even notice it's there.While I see a value in security on flights, I would prefer the pilot be flying the plane, a heavy duty metal door will suffice to keep the pilot flying the plane.
That's why air marshals (not sure about FFDOs, but I'd assume it's the same) carry frangible ammo. It won't penetrate the plastic seats or metal skin.Planes are cramped areas, and discharging a firearm at close range has a host of issues, one is over-penetration. I am not sure about anyone else but I don't want some pilot carrying a firearm firing it--not to mention a pilot who may not be trained to retain the firearm, and loses it to some terrorist or nut-job during a fight for control. It cramped areas like that, hand to hand combat is the best option. The pilot wants to carry something, a knife that he is trained to use proficiently; not that a knife fight doesn't have it's downsides.
10mm hole? What about the 6ft. hole Southwest recently had? What about Aloha Airlines flight 243 that lost half the cabin and still flew fine? 10mm hole is nothing. Hell, there is a 1.5-2ft. diameter hole in the tail of all the big guys; A little something called the outflow valve. There is a plethora of tests and research out there proving that catastrophic explosive decompression just doesn't happen, only in extremely rare and unusual cases.yep they are cramped areas. but you can put a 10mm hole just about anywhere in that plane and it'll be just fine. including every system and subsystem and the skin/windows. FFDO's are trained and retrained about the tactical limitations and dangers of shooting in a close environment exclusively because that is 100% of their agency. they are also given some hand to hand training. I don't think it's enough training either but I think since the scope of an FFDO's agency is so limited and therefor the training is focused on that small environment, the benefits are greater than the risks.
yep they are cramped areas. but you can put a 10mm hole just about anywhere in that plane and it'll be just fine. including every system and subsystem and the skin/windows. FFDO's are trained and retrained about the tactical limitations and dangers of shooting in a close environment exclusively because that is 100% of their agency. they are also given some hand to hand training. I don't think it's enough training either but I think since the scope of an FFDO's agency is so limited and therefor the training is focused on that small environment, the benefits are greater than the risks.
Isn't the assumption that the owner/user of the gun is untrained the same argument that the anti-gun groups use? If the pilot can't have one on a plane because it is assumed he's untrained, then you can't have or carry one either.
Sent using Tapatalk
[snip]
That's why air marshals (not sure about FFDOs, but I'd assume it's the same) carry frangible ammo. It won't penetrate the plastic seats or metal skin.
[snip]
I am not concerned about the skin of the plane being compromised. Frangibles come with downsides. All I am stating is that the pilot ought to be flying, not fighting, and shooting.
You might not be aware of this but we can't carry onto a plane.
I am. My point is that saying he shouldn't carry because he's untrained just feeds right in to the whole anti-gun sentiment.
Individuals who carry should have some miniman retention training, IMO *takes cover*.
*takes cover*.
Individuals who carry should have some miniman retention training, IMO *takes cover*.
what is miniman training?
The pilot firing at somebody implies the cockpit door has been breached. The choice between "fighting and flying" is moot. That's a far more worrisome situation than the fact that a firearm is being used.Planes are cramped areas, and discharging a firearm at close range has a host of issues, one is over-penetration. I am not sure about anyone else but I don't want some pilot carrying a firearm firing it--not to mention a pilot who may not be trained to retain the firearm, and loses it to some terrorist or nut-job during a fight for control