• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

I may reconsider my position on this.

PrayingForWar

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
1,701
Location
The Real World.
Since the moonbat messiah's regime started this controversy over contraception it has escalated to the point where Limbaugh apparently called a whore a slut, and of course the usual suspects got predicatably butthurt.

Of course if said whore was part of the Palin family.... (crickets)

Did the ayatollah of assaholas call Sarah Palin with words of encouagement after Bill Maher called her a c#^&? No, only people towing the fascist line are exempt from insulting rhetoric. I'm just glad obozo has time on his hands for such important endeavors.

But I digress...

I'm starting to think it might actually benefit society to subsidize contraception for liberals. Using this whore for an example, who is a 30 year old student at an expensive law school, but is too stupid too budget enough for contraception which I think she claimed cost her $3000 a year. Which is probably more than what many porn studios have too pay. I'm seriously concerned about the possibility of having this insipid parasite procreating at some point. This whore is actually a prime candidate for retroactive abortion.
 

Aknazer

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
1,760
Location
California
My question is, just how much sex are you having to run up a 3k bill in condoms and/or spermicide? Since that is all that is truely needed. And I know they also make female condoms, so if she doesn't trust the man using a condom then she can be the one to use it.
 

HandyHamlet

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Messages
2,772
Location
Terra, Sol
Wow. The media persona RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRUSH is still around? And relevant? I guess the moonbats will always need someone to tell them how to think.
 

DrakeZ07

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2011
Messages
1,080
Location
Lexington, Ky
I find it somewhat disturbing to see someone, or some people, referring to our President, and Leader of the Free world, as vulgar names. Y'all do realize that this forum can be viewed without having an account right? Which means anyone can see your posts with ease? Read and see what you're saying... Doesn't really give us a good platform if and when someone calls our entire community out, because a few of our members refer to the person holding such a high, respected office, "Obozo" and "Moonbat Massiah". Just saying, ya know?

Oh who am I kidding; Please, keep up the stupid, insipid referring, and names, and insults directed at a person of large power, and keep inviting the DHS, and ATF, and FBI to browse our forum, and make notes of every one of us posters and lurkers. Because we probably don't get enough secretive government attention as is, we need more!

"Rush is right" Really? Really? Well, he IS 'right' ... in the fashion of being RIGHT WING EXTREMIST... The fat Klansman who gets paid to rile up republicans, and anyone stupid enough to listen to him, incite rebellion through subversive means, and inspire idiots to lash out with hateful words, speeches, and actions. Yep, Because Rush is the most honest, pure, glorified version of man in the entire USA, and he is the only one whose opinion and idea's are right, and good, and he's such a great friend of Jesus, that he's survived heart attacks, and obesity, so he can preach the word of the holy republican Agenda.

You rush people are more nuts and insane than President Obama's left-wing nutjobs, and you should be ashamed of yourselves.

Hey, if PFW can do it, I can to! But with a bit of taste :D
 

Beretta92FSLady

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
5,264
Location
In My Coffee
There are two consequences to referring to the President in a derogatory way: (1) contributing to the eroding of the political system; (2) the party engaging in the behavior will pay a price politically--if you don't believe me, watch on November 6th, 2012.
 

Dreamer

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Messages
5,360
Location
Grennsboro NC
...but is too stupid too budget enough for contraception which I think she claimed cost her $3000 a year. Which is probably more than what many porn studios have too pay..


You obviously don't have a wife or daughter who has been on the pill...

It's around $30-75/week depending on the kind you get, plus doctors appointments.

IF this woman is going to Georgetown (and presumably lives in the DC area) and can get oral contraceptives (and the associated Ob-Gyn visits) for $3000/year, she's getting a TREMENDOUS DEAL, especially if she's uninsured and paying out of pocket. Most Ob-Gyns wont even take new patients in the DC area if you don't have insurance, and the ones that will, charge premium fees.

People take the pill for a myriad of reasons. Regulating menstrual cycles, family planning, or maybe they just enjoy having sex with their husband but don't want to get knocked up...

This whole "contraception hoohaa" is repulsive. The "right" doesn't seem to have ANY problem performing post-partum abortions on thousands of Iraqi, Pakistani, and Afghani children every year. They don't seem to have any problem shipping tons of cocaine and heroin into the US to enslave thousands of American women into lives of prostitution and degradation.

And the "left" doesn't seem to have any problem shipping tens of thousands of guns to Mexican drug lords so they can kill women and children in Mexico. They don't seem to have any problem continuing the Bush administration's Middle-East blood sacrifice to Mammon.

Cancer is at it's highest rate in history in industrialized nations. Monsanto is attempting to coopt the entire genome of the planet through their GMO terrorism attack on the crops of organic farmers, and the enslavement of third world farmers through forcing them to use their self-sterilizing seed stock. The US is shutting down electrical power generating plants in record numbers--to "save the earth", and meanwhile, China is building dirty coal-powered generation plants faster than some Americans change their underwear, spewing sulfur dioxide and heavy metals into the air an water at a rate that makes America in the post-WWII era look like an Eden-like environmental utopia.

WTF is anyone worried about whether or not a woman uses the Pill? It's OK for all you crypto-fascists to subsidize Dick Cheney's Viagra and Cialis prescriptions, but you've got an issue with a Law School student wanting to STAY IN SCHOOL and not get knocked up? WTF is wrong with you people?

Woman who want to control their own lives are a HUGE threat to the Status Quo--on both sides. Admit it. The "right" is essentially been transformed into the neo-feudaistic fascist wing of the same blood-thirsty vulture that the "left" acts as the neo-feudalistic collectivist wing for.

Wake up people--this "issue" is a double-edged dagger:

On one side it is a distraction from the REAL issues to keep the American people from asking REAL questions of their politicians (like WHY THE HELL are we still in Afghanistan, and WHY hasn't the entire Bush administration been endicted on war crimes charges, and why hasn't Eric Holder been clapped in irons and tossed into Leavenworth or Gitmo for Treason, or why isn't the Santorum's abortion in 1996 being BLASTED across the media, or whether or not we REALLY want a President (Romney) who wears magical underwear, thinks that God lives on his own planet, and considers blacks to have the "mark of Cain", etc, etc, etc)

On the other side, it is truly the "system" showing it's true agenda--which is to return the "common people" to the status of "chattel"--where only the rulers may decide who can reproduce, who they can mate with, and how many children they can have.

If a man has sex with a lot of women, he's seen as some sort of "mench". If he's been married 4 or 5 times, he's seen as some sort of stud-muffin or something.

But if a woman has more than one sexual partner in her life she's branded with a scarlet "A", and publicly defamed as a "whore" or a "slut".

Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict, a serial adulterer, a compulsive liar, and a fat sloppy propagandist whore for his financial puppet masters.

Rush calling someone else a "whore" is like Jeffry Daumer calling someone else excessively violent...
 
Last edited:

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
I find it somewhat disturbing to see someone, or some people, referring to our President, and Leader of the Free world, as vulgar names. Y'all do realize that this forum can be viewed without having an account right? Which means anyone can see your posts with ease? Read and see what you're saying... Doesn't really give us a good platform if and when someone calls our entire community out, because a few of our members refer to the person holding such a high, respected office, "Obozo" and "Moonbat Massiah". Just saying, ya know?

Oh, my!

Our president? Leader of the Free World?

Dangerous ideas. Very dangerous.

When I vote for the President, I do not--emphatically do not--vote for our president. I am voting for the senior executive of one of three branches of the federal government. Nothing more. He is not my president. He is the executive branch's president, the fed gov's president. Literally, nothing more.

The only leader I need is my supervisor at work and his boss. That's it. Nothing more. As for leadership on social issues, I will seek the ideas of men and women whose insight and wisdom I deem worthy. Men like Locke, Jefferson, Jesus of Nazareth, Bhudda, Cato, Socrates, von Mises, Rothbard, and so forth.

Nowhere in the constitution does it say a darned thing about the president being the leader of the free world, nor even the country's president.

To elevate the executive to leadership of the country (our president) is in fact to elevate him to the leadership of society. There's nothing about that in the constitution. Also, such elevation hands a president far more recognition than he deserves. He's the boss of the executive branch. That's all.

And, none of this speaks to the vicious criminality of expropriating people's earnings, or regulating them to death, or impoverishing them through monetary policy and debt.
 

HandyHamlet

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Messages
2,772
Location
Terra, Sol
He is the executive branch's president, the fed gov's president. Literally, nothing more.

And in this case the c*** s**** has violated his oath of office so many times it is impossible to keep track. Therefore he deserves NO respect the executive office normally demands.

Sidenote to self: Wonder if "c*** s*****" is on the Big Sis watch list of words...?
 

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
I'm pretty convinced Rush is part of the problem. He just feeds the divisiveness in this country.

I refuse to be angry at half the people with who I share this section of North America.

However, the elites who practice divide-and-conquer, and pander to human weaknesses in order satiate rent-seekers for their own political gain....
 
Last edited:

Tawnos

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2008
Messages
2,542
Location
Washington
If looking only for the birth control, an IUD is a one time cost of 200-400 bucks, plus cost of insertion. However, most women use birth control not only for the child protection, but the hormonal regulation. That can range from 15 bucks a month (generic pills with insurance) to 80+ bucks a month (e.g. Nuva ring without insurance). Additionally, for STD protection for sexually active people who aren't monogamous, good condoms are 1-2 dollars each. Cheap ones are free to 1 dollar each. Add to that a gynecological exam every year or twice a year, and STD tests in between partners, and you can easily get around 1500-2500 a year. Different areas may be more expensive, so it wouldn't shock me if that 3k figure is accurate (assuming you remember correctly) after tax and any attendant expenses.

Of course, PFW doesn't really care about any of that, he just wants to feel justified in his hatred and in calling women "whores."
 

PrayingForWar

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
1,701
Location
The Real World.
Not suprisingly, we see the self righteous indignation over references to the POTUS that are tame compared to that which Bush 43 endured. As bad as his policies were for constitutional freedom he didn't deserve a lot of it. I recall "artists" openly fantasizing about his death and getting acolades from bed wetting hollywood types.

BTW...

The last KLANSMAN who held any political power was
Senator Byrd D-W.VA.

As most of us are aware, in order to be a moonbat, one has too maintain a mind devoid of reality.


You obviously don't have a wife or daughter who has been on the pill...
... snip the nonsense...

My wife is on the pill and has been since our last baby, with insurance it's 26 bucks a month. What's a rubber cost? 2 bucks? I don't spend 8 bucks a day to feed myself sometimes, so I can't possibly imagine how someone needs more than that to prevent pregnancy. Maybe I'm being too prudish or judgemental, but instead of whining on national TV try this:

STOP ^%$##@ING AROUND YOU STUPID WHORE!!!! :p


Oh, my!
Our president? Leader of the Free World?
Dangerous ideas. Very dangerous.

Especially the current a$$clown.

When I vote for the President, I do not--emphatically do not--vote for our president. I am voting for the senior executive of one of three branches of the federal government. Nothing more. He is not my president. He is the executive branch's president, the fed gov's president. Literally, nothing more.
The only leader I need is my supervisor at work and his boss. That's it. Nothing more. As for leadership on social issues, I will seek the ideas of men and women whose insight and wisdom I deem worthy. Men like Locke, Jefferson, Jesus of Nazareth, Bhudda, Cato, Socrates, von Mises, Rothbard, and so forth.
Nowhere in the constitution does it say a darned thing about the president being the leader of the free world, nor even the country's president.
To elevate the executive to leadership of the country (our president) is in fact to elevate him to the leadership of society. There's nothing about that in the constitution. Also, such elevation hands a president far more recognition than he deserves. He's the boss of the executive branch. That's all.
And, none of this speaks to the vicious criminality of expropriating people's earnings, or regulating them to death, or impoverishing them through monetary policy and debt.


There needs to be an applauding emoticon, because this post gets a standing ovation from me. (Not really, I won't get up, but I am impressed with your point)
 

PrayingForWar

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
1,701
Location
The Real World.
I'm pretty convinced Rush is part of the problem. He just feeds the divisiveness in this country.

I refuse to be angry at half the people with who I share this section of North America.

However, the elites who practice divide-and-conquer, and pander to human weaknesses in order satiate rent-seekers for their own political gain....

I can respect that stance, but my disgust for people who clamor for the rest of society, or anyone else, to provide their food, clothing, shelter and now ******* BIRTH CONTROL!?!?!?!? leads me to be angry and literally HATE (I don't think it's half, more like 20%) the parasites who demand all these freebies. I also HATE the leftist media machine who drag these oxygen thieves out, and then try to manipulate people into feeling sorry for them. If that's not enough those of us who excoriate these parasites for their own failures and dependency are maligned for what seems to me a completely natural reaction and emotion.

I refuse to be embarassed for HATING people who have reversed the theory of evolution...

Now we live in a world where the strong prop up the weak, the intelligent are dragged down by idiots, and the independent are forced to serve the useless.
 

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
I can respect that stance, but my disgust for people who clamor for the rest of society, or anyone else, to provide their food, clothing, shelter and now ******* BIRTH CONTROL!?!?!?!? leads me to be angry and literally HATE (I don't think it's half, more like 20%) the parasites who demand all these freebies.

Thank you for the respect.

Don't overlook that the parasites wouldn't be demanding if they didn't think the criminal panderers wouldn't provide. If they thought they'd be refused, they wouldn't bother to demand.

It is the criminal panderers who provide the vital link in the chain. It is the criminal panderers who validate the parasites, making their demands seem legitimate.

If it were not for the criminal panderers, the parasites would have no access to their hosts' blood.
 

PrayingForWar

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
1,701
Location
The Real World.
Thank you for the respect.

Don't overlook that the parasites wouldn't be demanding if they didn't think the criminal panderers wouldn't provide. If they thought they'd be refused, they wouldn't bother to demand.

It is the criminal panderers who provide the vital link in the chain. It is the criminal panderers who validate the parasites, making their demands seem legitimate.

If it were not for the criminal panderers, the parasites would have no access to their hosts' blood.

Very good point, but I (that is we, the "host") aren't solely responsible for the fact these criminal panderers get elected. The parasites are allowed too vote too. Maybe only property owners should be allowed to vote, or people who actually pay income taxes. That right there would make the democrap party extinct, and radically change the repuke party.

To be honest I don't even mind having some "safety net" or a system that provides subsistance for people who
through no fault of their own are unable to be productive. We gone so far past a tolerable level of charity that people in LAW SCHOOL (not a cheap one either) are whining about paying $3000 a year for something that is actually a luxury. That frosts my ass on the surface, and causes great concern for the future of the empire.

Even more ludicrous is the vitriol, wailing, and indignation not over the complete idiocy above, but over some radio show host how actually hits the nail on the head when he calls a whore a slut.

THAT'S the issue we're supposed to be upset about.

So it's not just the criminal political scum that comprises the entirety of the democrap party, and a significant part of the repukes. It's the media, academia, and a large part of the entertainment industry. I can't believe there are people who can even read this post and not understand why people like me have such contempt for the liberal "mentality", let alone re-examine their own fundamentals and realize just how detrimental to humanity their political persuasion is.

I was a lib myself till about 20 years ago. The fact that there are any left in spite of the availability of information boggles the mind. Until I realize...

Childproof lids on household chemicals prevented the genetically stupid from following the natural path to extinction.
 
Top