I'm not, I'm not the FBI I just wonder why you assume he's innocent.
I assume he is innocent, until he is proven guilty.
And, I haven't seen compelling evidence of guilt. Why are you trying so hard to prove him guilty? If you are not set upon proving him guilty, why do you continue to do exactly that?
And, more to the point, NONE of us have actual information about the case. We only have what has shown up in the media, whether it is correct or incorrect. Until shown otherwise, I will tend to believe the official statements from the local LE and City sources, and tend to disbelieve information that isn't from those sources. For instance, the fabrications the family's lawyer presents.