-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
More Proof...
- Thread starter Sheldon
- Start date
VW_Factor
Regular Member
Why more of this? /facepalm
DrakeZ07
Regular Member
-That's been done before, by the National Socialist German Workers Party, from 1933-1945. Find something else to do that hasn't been done beore.
-Oh? Like say, verbal/written acts of sedition and treason in some light minor way, said on a publicly viewed forum?
--Huh, and here I thought "Survival of the fittest" was a Evolutionary term, part of Darwin's theory of Evolution. What is generally wrong with promoting and adhering to an alternate thought process relating to religion, or a lack thereof? Are Christians only allowed to willfully promote their religion, while other "false" religions are not allowed to practice their beliefs in any way that can be deemed public, along with atheists, and non-theists practicing their non-belief?
What have we Liberals/Democrats, done to make it seem like we wish to drag down the intelligent, and further dumb-down America's average IQ score?
Is not Liberalism a means to open one's mind to all possibilities of education and higher learning, so each intelligent person can help each other out and better our society from archaic traditions, rituals, and help enlighten our society? Does not Liberal's stand on a principle of rectifying openness to our planet, and with one another?
Funny enough, Laws of nature, is a Evolutionist term.
Last edited:
georg jetson
Regular Member
I think you missed the point... that it is the "liberals" that promote atheism and Darwin's Theory as the explanation of life. It's a bit ironic that those same liberals want to take from the less "fit" and give it to the more "fit"... trying to fight their own explanation of how things should work.
NO. Liberalism is the descriptor one earns by buying into, or profiting from, the idea that one can be free and yet still dependent. Society benefits from charity when that charity is FREELY given. Forced charity is slavery and dependance on forced charity is slavery.
Maybe... yet evolutionists NEVER attempt to describe how those laws came about.
The most important issue is NOT that Obama is replaced, but that he's replaced with someone different than the republican/democrat BS we've forced to accept. It's not good enough to simply beat Obama, we must beat what he stands for...
...and this whole "place of birth" thing isn't going to help.
Last edited:
marshaul
Campaign Veteran
Agreed.
Edit: Well, you edited it, but I still agree.
Frankly, the endless procession of birther distraction threads annoys me. It's clear to me that Obama is encouraging the "birthers" intentionally, having realized that A: it pretty much automatically discredits a large portion of his critics, and more importantly B: even for those who don't find it discrediting, it's a distraction from real issues, and will never amount to a hill of beans, and he knows it.
Last edited:
Fallschirjmäger
Active member
Here, I have to agree with 92F, anyone or any party doing the whole "Anyone But X" is certifiably idiotic.
Seriously, what kind of weak-minded, idiot would Ever come up with a slogan like that?
Stanley
Regular Member
Simple minds are distracted by simple things.
As a liberal, when someone on the right provides a claim and some evidence to back it up I'll listen. You may even get me to change my mind on that point or at least think about it.
You bring up his "birth" and automatically you are an ignorant fool grasping at straws out of hate for him seemingly based on his race.
Of course, that may not be true at all. In fact, it may be 100% off base but...
That's the perception and perception is 90% of reality so they say. Birther equates to racist moron like sagging pants and gold teeth equate to ignorant thug.
Either find some REAL, damning evidence or move on. Quit holding on to it like a paranoid schizophrenic obsessing over a conspiracy.
LET. IT. GO...
As a liberal, when someone on the right provides a claim and some evidence to back it up I'll listen. You may even get me to change my mind on that point or at least think about it.
You bring up his "birth" and automatically you are an ignorant fool grasping at straws out of hate for him seemingly based on his race.
Of course, that may not be true at all. In fact, it may be 100% off base but...
That's the perception and perception is 90% of reality so they say. Birther equates to racist moron like sagging pants and gold teeth equate to ignorant thug.
Either find some REAL, damning evidence or move on. Quit holding on to it like a paranoid schizophrenic obsessing over a conspiracy.
LET. IT. GO...
Last edited:
Beretta92FSLady
Regular Member
And who won in 2004? Not Kerry.
Republicans ought to learn from the Democrats mistake in 2004.
I wonder: if Democrats were the idiots to think up that slogan, then what does that say about Republicans who are taking the same failed slogan for another spin around the block?
Beretta92FSLady
Regular Member
If it is a political negative then why would the Republicans keep doing it? I was watching FOX news yesterday, and they were talking about President Obama's birth certificate. There are millions of individuals who watch FOX, and this is what the staunch Republican program has to offer-up? Republicans ought to be railing against things that will have an actual affect on President Obama's reelection.
Hell, Hannity was jabber-jawing about Ayers, and Wright; get a freaking clue--it didn't work four years ago, why would it work now? Sometimes I wonder if Republicans want President Obama to win again, and they have set their sights on 2016, all but throwing in the towel for 2012.
sudden valley gunner
Regular Member
Exactly what I think. I lived in Hawaii, he may very well have not been born there and still get a "live birth certificate". But it is a moot point and a distraction. Get everybody to watch the left hand so we don't know what the right one is doing.
marshaul
Campaign Veteran
Don't ask me. The only thing dumber than a democrat is a republican, and the only thing dumber than a republican is a democrat.
Last edited:
Beretta92FSLady
Regular Member
I enjoy agreeing with you but let's not make a habit of it!
OC for ME
Regular Member
Fortunately, more citizens ARE watching the other hand too.
sudden valley gunner
Regular Member
Yep we are voting for Ron Paul.....:lol:
M1A shooter
Regular Member
Sheriff: “We believe, probable cause exists, indicating forgery, and fraud have been committed.”
Sounds definitive to me.--especially the first part of his statement: "We believe...."
Six months of investigation on the dime of Arizona taxpayers, you would think that he would be more sure in his statement.
I worry for the Republican party. This type of unnecessary digging is only going to hurt them. Do people actually believe that SCOTUS would take-up this issue, and Find that President Obama is not the President? Don't count on it.
He is not doing the investigation on AZ taxpayers money. The Posse is fully funded by donations. By the way shocking news on this matter to be delivered on July 9, 2012.
