SNIP...
Since the current "authority" is dominated by libtard stupidity, and the youth (at least in my day) have a rebellious nature, being a "cool" teacher and influencing young minds to question authority and reject the status quo will effectively turn the tables on the marxists by using their own tactics against them, seems like a great way to play at least an infinitesimal part in defeating the enemies of our republic./snip
There are a variety of things each of us can do beyond just voting to solve our problems.
Something I've alluded to before but I'm still sort of amused by:
Libtards generally promote atheism and Darwin's Theory. (Not all, but the most vocal) It can easily be pointed out that libtard policies reverse the idea of "survival of the fittest" since their policies promote the strong being dragged down by the weak. The intelligent being slowed down in favor of letting dumber people catch up, and industrious people being forced to sustain people who are useless by choice, not even due too a legitimate handicap. Liberalism promotes "survival of the weakest, at the expense of the fittest", and is in violation of the laws of nature.
Put that in a paint can and huff it.
SNIP
--Huh, and here I thought "Survival of the fittest" was a Evolutionary term, part of Darwin's theory of Evolution. What is generally wrong with promoting and adhering to an alternate thought process relating to religion, or a lack thereof? Are Christians only allowed to willfully promote their religion, while other "false" religions are not allowed to practice their beliefs in any way that can be deemed public, along with atheists, and non-theists practicing their non-belief?
What have we Liberals/Democrats, done to make it seem like we wish to drag down the intelligent, and further dumb-down America's average IQ score?
Is not Liberalism a means to open one's mind to all possibilities of education and higher learning, so each intelligent person can help each other out and better our society from archaic traditions, rituals, and help enlighten our society? Does not Liberal's stand on a principle of rectifying openness to our planet, and with one another?
Funny enough, Laws of nature, is a Evolutionist term.
It's not good enough to simply beat Obama, we must beat what he stands for... and this whole "place of birth" thing isn't going to help.
Here, I have to agree with 92F, anyone or any party doing the whole "Anyone But X" is certifiably idiotic.I stand corrected, if it was all volunteer time.
If accusing the President of not being a citizen (has been going on for nearly four years now) is all Republicans have, then Republicans are in worse shape than I thought. That sort of appeal is up there with the whole "anyone but Obama" rallying cry. It may work for some but not with most, IMO.
Here, I have to agree with 92F, anyone or any party doing the whole "Anyone But X" is certifiably idiotic.
Seriously, what kind of weak-minded, idiot would Ever come up with a slogan like that?
Agreed.
Edit: Well, you edited it, but I still agree.
Frankly, the endless procession of birther distraction threads annoys me. It's clear to me that Obama is encouraging the "birthers" intentionally, having realized that A: it pretty much automatically discredits a large portion of his critics, and more importantly B: even for those who don't find it discrediting, it's a distraction from real issues, and will never amount to a hill of beans, and he knows it.
Agreed.
Edit: Well, you edited it, but I still agree.
Frankly, the endless procession of birther distraction threads annoys me. It's clear to me that Obama is encouraging the "birthers" intentionally, having realized that A: it pretty much automatically discredits a large portion of his critics, and more importantly B: even for those who don't find it discrediting, it's a distraction from real issues, and will never amount to a hill of beans, and he knows it.
If it is a political negative then why would the Republicans keep doing it? I was watching FOX news yesterday, and they were talking about President Obama's birth certificate. There are millions of individuals who watch FOX, and this is what the staunch Republican program has to offer-up? Republicans ought to be railing against things that will have an actual affect on President Obama's reelection.
Hell, Hannity was jabber-jawing about Ayers, and Wright; get a freaking clue--it didn't work four years ago, why would it work now? Sometimes I wonder if Republicans want President Obama to win again, and they have set their sights on 2016, all but throwing in the towel for 2012.
Don't ask me. The only thing dumber than a democrat is a republican, and the only thing dumber than a republican is a democrat.
Fortunately, more citizens ARE watching the other hand too.Exactly what I think. I lived in Hawaii, he may very well have not been born there and still get a "live birth certificate". But it is a moot point and a distraction. Get everybody to watch the left hand so we don't know what the right one is doing.
Fortunately, more citizens ARE watching the other hand too.
Sheriff: “We believe, probable cause exists, indicating forgery, and fraud have been committed.”
Sounds definitive to me.--especially the first part of his statement: "We believe...."
Six months of investigation on the dime of Arizona taxpayers, you would think that he would be more sure in his statement.
I worry for the Republican party. This type of unnecessary digging is only going to hurt them. Do people actually believe that SCOTUS would take-up this issue, and Find that President Obama is not the President? Don't count on it.