• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

No... This is a double-stack 1911...

Fallschirjmäger

Active member
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
3,823
Location
Cumming, Georgia, USA
more courtesy of MilitaryTimes.com
w030912rcmodel-2011-01.jpg


w030912rcmodel-2011-02.jpg
 

cbpeck

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2009
Messages
405
Location
Pasco, Washington, USA
They make a few other interesting things too. It'll be curious if the BATF will let them import the design to the US. I'd like to have one!
 

45acpForMe

Newbie
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
2,805
Location
Yorktown, Virginia, USA
They should have called it the "Doubletap" 1911. :) Doubletap ammo even has a picture of its result on their box...

dtap.jpg


I always thought that select fire two and three round burst were more useful than full auto anyway. :)
 

09jisaac

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
1,692
Location
Louisa, Kentucky
I always thought that select fire two and three round burst were more useful than full auto anyway. :)

Just depends on what you were wanting. If you just wanted to run through a box of ammo in the shortest time possible (what most of us would be using it for most of the time) then full auto would be better.

For engagements then you are right.
 
Top