Got to love his conflating of public property and private property. Public schools aren't somebody else's property; they're the property of the people of Oregon. By his logic, our governments could take all private property under eminent domain, then declare that we couldn't bring firearms onto their property. There has to be some logical reason for the government to restrict natural rights (under intermediate scrutiny), and simply saying that the "owners" of the property don't like it isn't good enough. With regards to restricting guns from schools, there isn't a logical reason to do so. With regards to prisons, jails, and criminal courtrooms, there is a logical reason to do so.