• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Mickleshoot.

briehl12

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
112
Location
Auburn, wa
This may have been talked about before but anything I need to know about going to the reservation either oc or cc?
 

TechnoWeenie

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
2,084
Location
, ,
Be careful, as casinos are still under LCB purview. Which means areas that serve alcohol and restricted to 21+ are still 'no carry'., which is every casino floor I'm aware of...
 

Metalhead47

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Messages
2,800
Location
South Whidbey, Washington, USA
This may have been talked about before but anything I need to know about going to the reservation either oc or cc?


What Techno said about the casinos. For all intents & purposes, they're bars, so having a weapon is unlawful. Other than that, just look at the reservations as private property (which they are). Tribal police cannot enforce tribal law upon non-tribe members, but they can ask you to leave the reservation outright. Unless you're very familiar with Muckleshoot's laws & attitudes towards firearms, you're probably better off just concealing and not bringing it into a casino.
 

Wolfebane

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
113
Location
Whidbey Island
I stopped off to get gas at the twin bridges indian gas station, I was told by the officer inside when I tried to pay that I could have it on my person either OC or CC while outside but not when entering an indian building.
 

ManInBlack

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
1,551
Location
SW Idaho
Other than that, just look at the reservations as private property (which they are). Tribal police cannot enforce tribal law upon non-tribe members, but they can ask you to leave the reservation outright.

This isn't too bad, but what I would be really afraid of is them seizing and holding my weapon, and having to go through a tribal law process to get it back.

Whenever I have occasion to travel through a reservation, I make every attempt to avoid drawing attention to the fact that I am armed.
 

sudden valley gunner

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
16,674
Location
Whatcom County
Ive had no problems on Lummi or Tulalip. On Lummi of course I have family on Lummi. I ran into the head of council several times in town while armed and twice out on Lummi said nothing about my firearm.
 

hermannr

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,327
Location
Okanogan Highland
Some reservations restrict, some do not...you need to know the tribal law..generally speaking public highways and places like outside at gas stations are OK. Some tribes (Colville's) do have a tribal permit, is a may issue through the tribal council if you wish to carry off the public roadways..basically, just respect their tribal rights and you will do fine.
 

sudden valley gunner

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
16,674
Location
Whatcom County
Some reservations restrict, some do not...you need to know the tribal law..generally speaking public highways and places like outside at gas stations are OK. Some tribes (Colville's) do have a tribal permit, is a may issue through the tribal council if you wish to carry off the public roadways..basically, just respect their tribal rights and you will do fine.

Respect has a lot to do with it. Some white Americans are very arrogant and self important, they are the ones that tend to have the most problems on tribal land.
 

ManInBlack

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
1,551
Location
SW Idaho
Respect has a lot to do with it. Some white Americans are very arrogant and self important, they are the ones that tend to have the most problems on tribal land.

Let's be fair now; the sword cuts both ways. As a hunter, I have heard my fill of high-and-mighty, holier-than-thou platitudes from American Indians about how they are "guardians of the land," and have a "special relationship with nature" because of the DNA in their blood. All the while, of course, ignoring the fact that their ancestors, like other Stone Age hunter-gatherers, did things like run huge herds of buffalo and elk over cliffs, and set forest fires to drive out game. I don't really have a problem with that, per se, because you do what you have to do feed your family, but it's really no different from what ancient Europeans did 15,000 years ago. People are people.

With regards to tribal land, let me say that I have no problem with tribes being truly autonomous and sovereign. In fact, I advocate the secession of ethnically and culturally distinct groups to preserve their uniqueness, should they so desire. However, the American Indians have it both ways; they have "sovereign land" where they can make laws, restrict ownership to tribal members, deny fundamental American Constitutional rights, don't pay taxes, etc., but yet they are American citizens, can vote in elections, can travel off the reservation without passports, can import/export to and from the reservation without paying any duties or fees, receive federal government benefits, etc. In my humble opinion, this double-standard is not fair for anyone, and should be rectified either by true independence or by absorption.

ETA: In many cases, the appalling poverty seen on some reservations is the direct result of mismanagement or outright corruption of tribal leadership, who screw over their own people out of incompetence or personal gain. Again, no different from the situation of white Americans vis-a-vis the government.
 
Last edited:

sudden valley gunner

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
16,674
Location
Whatcom County
Let's be fair now; the sword cuts both ways. As a hunter, I have heard my fill of high-and-mighty, holier-than-thou platitudes from American Indians about how they are "guardians of the land," and have a "special relationship with nature" because of the DNA in their blood. All the while, of course, ignoring the fact that their ancestors, like other Stone Age hunter-gatherers, did things like run huge herds of buffalo and elk over cliffs, and set forest fires to drive out game. I don't really have a problem with that, per se, because you do what you have to do feed your family, but it's really no different from what ancient Europeans did 15,000 years ago. People are people.

With regards to tribal land, let me say that I have no problem with tribes being truly autonomous and sovereign. In fact, I advocate the secession of ethnically and culturally distinct groups to preserve their uniqueness, should they so desire. However, the American Indians have it both ways; they have "sovereign land" where they can make laws, restrict ownership to tribal members, deny fundamental American Constitutional rights, don't pay taxes, etc., but yet they are American citizens, can vote in elections, can travel off the reservation without passports, can import/export to and from the reservation without paying any duties or fees, receive federal government benefits, etc. In my humble opinion, this double-standard is not fair for anyone, and should be rectified either by true independence or by absorption.

ETA: In many cases, the appalling poverty seen on some reservations is the direct result of mismanagement or outright corruption of tribal leadership, who screw over their own people out of incompetence or personal gain. Again, no different from the situation of white Americans vis-a-vis the government.


I don't see much I disagree with there. This hippy myth of Natives living in harmony with nature is well just a myth.

I point to the Rez as a perfect example of why depending on someone else is horrible way to live it saps human will and innovation, motivation right out of ya that a welfare state is good for no one. And yep corruption on tribal politics is rampant, like my cousins and I say gov is corrupt from the Federal level to State to County to tribal.

As far as U.S citizenry goes, I feel tribal members should be able to renounce it if they want. That is a double edged sword. One thing to remember though is that many of the things "white" folks complain about as unfair was given to natives for exchange of their land and as a peace treaty so we wouldn't keep killing each other.

I lived several years in Hawaii, I got along great with locals, being part native may have helped, the culture of respect was similar and I fit in. I would tend to avoid some Haole's because when you are on the other side you do notice the arrogance and "air of superiority" some exhibit. You see this on the Rez too with some white visitors, who just assume their methods and their culture is better than others. This is something I have observed between cultures in general too, folks from India, Russia, China, etc...bashing the western culture and not respecting how we do things here too... they are the ones who usually complain about rampant racism, when in actuality people just don't like them personally, not because of their skin color. (disclaimer, I have many friends from many cultures, who don't do this, and am not bashing any ethnicity or culture )
 

jt59

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2010
Messages
1,005
Location
Central South Sound
I don't see much I disagree with there. This hippy myth of Natives living in harmony with nature is well just a myth.

I point to the Rez as a perfect example of why depending on someone else is horrible way to live it saps human will and innovation, motivation right out of ya that a welfare state is good for no one. And yep corruption on tribal politics is rampant, like my cousins and I say gov is corrupt from the Federal level to State to County to tribal.

As far as U.S citizenry goes, I feel tribal members should be able to renounce it if they want. That is a double edged sword. One thing to remember though is that many of the things "white" folks complain about as unfair was given to natives for exchange of their land and as a peace treaty so we wouldn't keep killing each other.

I lived several years in Hawaii, I got along great with locals, being part native may have helped, the culture of respect was similar and I fit in. I would tend to avoid some Haole's because when you are on the other side you do notice the arrogance and "air of superiority" some exhibit. You see this on the Rez too with some white visitors, who just assume their methods and their culture is better than others. This is something I have observed between cultures in general too, folks from India, Russia, China, etc...bashing the western culture and not respecting how we do things here too... they are the ones who usually complain about rampant racism, when in actuality people just don't like them personally, not because of their skin color. (disclaimer, I have many friends from many cultures, who don't do this, and am not bashing any ethnicity or culture )

Wise beyond his years...+1
 
Top