Sorry guys, I can't seem to get over this bug. Good thing we didn't get arrested, cause it sure would've sucked setting in jail feeling like this!
What this guy does not understand is this: THIS ORDINANCE IS VIOLATING STATE LAW, and CAN'T BE ENFORCED! The only part that IS ENFORCEABLE is the "no concealed weapons in buildings!" Even then, if you was a competent individual and actually read the STATUTES that govern your counties ability to regulate firearms, THE COUNTY CAN'T DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN ASK YOU TO LEAVE if they discover you are carrying concealed, or you can uncover and carry openly!
I'm thrilled he acted the way he did. I have been advised to wait this out, SAVE THE
AUDIO, and take him and the sheriff to court.
Here are the facts, that even us peons that do not have a law degree understand:
KRS 65.870- prohibits locales from enacting ANY restrictions on firearms, unless the state legislature specifically passes a bill into law that allows them to do so.
KRS 237.115- this statute gives locales the authority to ban CONCEALED firearms INSIDE BUILDINGS they CONTROL, which would be the county courthouse we were REMOVED
from. The courthouse has the county clerk's office, county attorney's office, judge/exec.'s office, PVA, notice these are all PUBLIC OFFICES! The courthouse ANNEX is located to the right of the county courthouse, and obviously, it holds courtrooms for court of justice, circuit clerk, etc., needless to say we can not enter into this building!, and I would venture to guess this annex has metal detectors!
This statute also makes it VERY CLEAR you can't arrest someone for violating the "no concealed weapons provision. It also make it clear, that in order for this ordinance to be effective, signs must be posted at all entrances to buildings where "no concealed" weapons are allowed!
I can't even list all of the AG opinions that pertain to these issues, or the Supreme Court of KY's ruling that says no one can question our right to openly carry a firearm! Apparently this guy didn't get the memo!
I would like to thank him though, and every other city and county out there that believe they can ignore state law, and claim "home rule status," even though the very rule they claim gives them this right to regulate firearms says they do not have "home rule" authority if the ordinance violates the state CONSTITUTION or STATE LAW! If it was not for locales such as Lawrence county who choose to violate state law and our rights, we wouldn't have worked so hard to obtain one of the strongest firearm preemption statutes in the country, (newly amended KRS 65.870; HB500 for the sheriff, look it up, I gave you copies to!), and we would still not have the right to take these individuals to court! But, most importantly, we now can have their "immunity," (granted to them under section 231 of the state constitution), stripped from them, and can have them charged with OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT!
This very statute grants the authority to have him charged, when he is found to be in violation of state firearm preemption, and the one refusing to A) Stop enforcing the illegal ordinance, and B) Refusing to inform the county of their ordinances' violation of state law!