I remember some talk at times (texaschlforum.com) of a case that was lost on appeal where a CHL holder was convicted of ulawful carry by a CHL instead of the traditional 46. (which applies to everyone without a CHL). The accused wasn't able to enter any of the defenses under 46 because he wasn't charged under that chapter, was convicted and lost on appeal for the same reasoning. Good Luck and keep us posted...














Reply With Quote


