The prosecutor struggle to make any case. He presented a ton of what if's and stating only 'his' concerns, with very little meat to counter the the debate. Although he has had experience in prosecuting and dealing with the SYG/Castle Doctrine on a limited basis, he lost the debate and actually did more good for these laws.
Not sure if the CATO wanted it to come out this way, but revising/changing SYG/CD didn't garner much strength with the prosecutor comments.