• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Cato Institute discussion on "Stand Your Ground" laws

Redbaron007

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2011
Messages
1,613
Location
SW MO
The prosecutor struggle to make any case. He presented a ton of what if's and stating only 'his' concerns, with very little meat to counter the the debate. Although he has had experience in prosecuting and dealing with the SYG/Castle Doctrine on a limited basis, he lost the debate and actually did more good for these laws.

Not sure if the CATO wanted it to come out this way, but revising/changing SYG/CD didn't garner much strength with the prosecutor comments.
 

We-the-People

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
2,221
Location
White City, Oregon, USA
I was bummed when the video ended before the "rebuttal" time of the speakers. I'm sure Cramer and Ayoob would have torn apart several of his comments. Particularly the one about the man Ayoob discussed who sat in jail for over 100 days and lost everything as being "the system worked". HARDLY!
 
Top