Beretta92FSLady
Regular Member
I have been fixed on a general argument that mentally ill individuals ought not be allowed to own firearms.
Now, if some person has no grasp of Reality, they ought not own firearms, IMO.--for instance: Someone who believes they are from planet Mars, and can travel through time, and that humans are actually robots created by some far-off alien civilization.
Back to Reality (at least A Reality)...
If an individual is sane enough to be deemed responsible for their 'actions' then they ought to be permitted to own firearms; anyone disagree with this assertion? I realize that the assertion is that individuals would be "deemed sane enough."--if you disagree with the assertion that individuals ought to be 'deemed' anything, I understand; I am not asserting that that is my view, that individuals ought to be deemed, it's just that individuals are, by the System.
Now, if some person has no grasp of Reality, they ought not own firearms, IMO.--for instance: Someone who believes they are from planet Mars, and can travel through time, and that humans are actually robots created by some far-off alien civilization.
Back to Reality (at least A Reality)...
If an individual is sane enough to be deemed responsible for their 'actions' then they ought to be permitted to own firearms; anyone disagree with this assertion? I realize that the assertion is that individuals would be "deemed sane enough."--if you disagree with the assertion that individuals ought to be 'deemed' anything, I understand; I am not asserting that that is my view, that individuals ought to be deemed, it's just that individuals are, by the System.