• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Sb59??

Yance

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
568
Location
Battle Creek, MI
Thanks guys, I want to make an intelligent presentation.

And I'm pretty outspoken about vehicle carrying being changed so if you want to have any discussions about it let me know, I'd be glad to give you my piece of mind about it and throw some ideas your way.
 

DrTodd

Michigan Moderator
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
3,272
Location
Hudsonville , Michigan, USA
And I'm pretty outspoken about vehicle carrying being changed so if you want to have any discussions about it let me know, I'd be glad to give you my piece of mind about it and throw some ideas your way.

The issue of "car carry" being allowed as an extension of one's home has USUALLY been a result of a decision by a court in the particular state.

Not to play "grammar police" here but if Senator Richardville's ability to support legislation that expands the way in which people are able to exercise their Second Amendment right is related to his approach to grammar, there is little hope. I know I'm being a bit snarky but I think it would be wise for Senator Richardville to proofread his email before he hits "send". His statement is, in my opinion, an official communication sent to a constituent and should be free of glaring errors. :banghead:
 
Last edited:
Top