There is no clashing point. Private property, whether open to the public or not, has one right - the right to make you leave.
It's not like they have the right to disarm you, that would be overstepping their authority and your right to be armed.
They have the right to not let you be on their property - that's it. If you choose to be on their property, you'll need to be mindful of their rules.
If you don't want to follow the rules of attendiong that property, take all of your intact rights with you when you leave.
You never had the right to be there, only an open invitiation (or an invitation with posted parameters as in your picture) which may be rescinded at any time for nearly any or no reason at all.
How is this a 2A issue?
ATM said:If you choose to be on their property, you'll need to be mindful of their rules.
... How is this a 2A issue?
So what if a privately-owned business put a sign on the door saying "no [insert your religion here]"?TruxLupus said:Unfortunately privately owned businesses, even though they are open to the general public, are legally allowed to suppress and/or deny individual citizens their second amendment rights.
I had read somewhere that Gary and East Chicago, IN are the only two jurisdictions that are exempt from having to honor Indiana LTCH? I think that equates to no carry if I remember. If that is not true what is the issue with the signs? Just ignore them and CCW since they have no force of law and can only trespass you if you ARE found out and refuse to leave...
So what if a privately-owned business put a sign on the door saying "no [insert your religion here]"?
Private property, right? They can refuse you entry, right?
If not, what makes 1A rights any more important than 2A?
The way I read the sign only police are allowed in period and they cannot have weapons or guns.
So what if a privately-owned business put a sign on the door saying "no [insert your religion here]"?
Private property, right? They can refuse you entry, right?
If not, what makes 1A rights any more important than 2A?
Protected classes are based on people. I doubt it will ever be applied to physical objects people choose to carry....
People who have been mugged, injured, raped and murdered because they were required to be defenseless would disagree.
The 2nd Amendment should be recognized as a civil right, just like those protected by the 1st.