25 shot overnight in chicago - how is that possible???

hammer6 · May 28, 2012

i thought you weren't allowed to carry in chicago? how are people getting shot if there aren't any guns?

http://www.wgntv.com/news/wgntv-chi...overnight-in-chicago-20120527,0,5184162.story

XD4ME · May 29, 2012

Is Holder running a new Gunwalker .......... just in Chicago this time?

Glock9mmOldStyle · May 29, 2012

hammer6 said:
i thought you weren't allowed to carry in chicago? how are people getting shot if there aren't any guns?

http://www.wgntv.com/news/wgntv-chi...overnight-in-chicago-20120527,0,5184162.story

Ah duh... they are stealing them from the people who aren't allowed to have them...wait stealing non existing guns...never mind, /sarcasm. Our media is at best retarded, at worst lying to aid the gun/rights grabbers.

Giving up civil rights for security is a certain way to lose both!

scott58dh · May 29, 2012

Obamas' Hope in Action

Headline,,,2008,"Obama is the Future Hope of America" ,,:question: :exclaim:

The President wasn't able to give Hope to his hometown, so what's he have to offer for ***Another*** 4 years ?!?!

Empty promises for empty headed peeps.

:arrow:; Click on Pic :lol: View attachment 8525

davidmcbeth · May 29, 2012

You never visited the southside or westside of chicago ... 25 shot? Sounds like the temperature was warm. Pretty normal.

hjmoosejaw · May 29, 2012

Twenty five shot, one died. It's a good thing they can't shoot for s^#t. You guys are right, how could this have happened when people aren't allowed to carry there?

gobbly · May 29, 2012

They were all shot by the police of course

skidmark · May 29, 2012

Just to get the point in -

How many of those who shot the 25 people were otherwise law-abiding citizens? How many of the shootings would be ruled excusable/justifiable if that silly no-you-can't-have-guns thing was not in the way?

So you are telling me that even if you had rules that allowed folks to have guns these 25 shootings would not have happened in accordance with the rules?

This >

< is my shocked face.

stay safe.

hjmoosejaw · May 29, 2012

I'm guessing that most of them were thugs shooting thugs or thugs shooting innocent people. It seems that if they were innocent people shooting in self defense, there would have been a lot more bad press about it. IMHO.

since9 · May 30, 2012

Dear Congressman X:

This is what happens when you prevent the general law-abiding populace from defending themselves against law-breaking criminals.

Sincerely...

Encl. (Link to article)

merc460 · Jun 2, 2012

skidmark said:
Just to get the point in -

How many of those who shot the 25 people were otherwise law-abiding citizens? How many of the shootings would be ruled excusable/justifiable if that silly no-you-can't-have-guns thing was not in the way?

So you are telling me that even if you had rules that allowed folks to have guns these 25 shootings would not have happened in accordance with the rules?

This >< is my shocked face.

stay safe.

Ha Ha Ha, that line made me think of this... (I had to do it!)

Beretta92FSLady · Jun 2, 2012

Banning firearms didn't work. They ought to place a ban on murder too see if that works.

25 shot overnight in chicago - how is that possible???

hammer6

Regular Member

XD4ME

Regular Member

Glock9mmOldStyle

Campaign Veteran

scott58dh

Regular Member

davidmcbeth

Banned

hjmoosejaw

Regular Member

gobbly

Regular Member

skidmark

Campaign Veteran

hjmoosejaw

Regular Member

since9

Campaign Veteran

merc460

Regular Member

Beretta92FSLady

Regular Member