• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Recording Professors

karolynrgalarza

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
67
Location
Newport News, Virginia, USA
I know that Virginia has a 1-person consent law to recording: § 19.2-62.2

"2. It shall not be a criminal offense under this chapter for a person to intercept a wire, electronic or oral communication, where such person is a party to the communication or one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to such interception."

And I know this has nothing to do with open carry. But my professor at GMU told me today i could not record him giving us questions for a video (voice recording) because it is illegal to record and he can go to the GMU lawyers and sue anyone that does this. I know GMU is a state institution and should follow state laws, but then again they have their own exception in our VA codes not allowing lawful gun owners to carry inside of academic buildings. Does anyone know if there is a different law that does not allow us to record professors? Thanks!
 

peter nap

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
13,551
Location
Valhalla
I know that Virginia has a 1-person consent law to recording: § 19.2-62.2

"2. It shall not be a criminal offense under this chapter for a person to intercept a wire, electronic or oral communication, where such person is a party to the communication or one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to such interception."

And I know this has nothing to do with open carry. But my professor at GMU told me today i could not record him giving us questions for a video (voice recording) because it is illegal to record and he can go to the GMU lawyers and sue anyone that does this. I know GMU is a state institution and should follow state laws, but then again they have their own exception in our VA codes not allowing lawful gun owners to carry inside of academic buildings. Does anyone know if there is a different law that does not allow us to record professors? Thanks!

No, there's no exception for Professors. It's pretty simple, if you're a party to the conversation or if you have the permission of a party, it's legal.

In your situation though, there may be a school policy and since you're a student, they can discipline you based on that.
As far as a lawsuit....you can sue anyone for anything.
 

karolynrgalarza

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
67
Location
Newport News, Virginia, USA
I have been through the student handbook about rules and regs and have found nothing about recording. I would assume as there is a law in our state that allows this, that if someone tries to sue me for recording them, it would go no where in civil court. But then again, who knows.
 

peter nap

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
13,551
Location
Valhalla
I would assume as there is a law in our state that allows this, that if someone tries to sue me for recording them, it would go no where in civil court..

It can get expensive defending against it and if he was using the School Lawyers, the cost doesn't bother him at all.
If it's a frivolous suit, the judge can (Not Will) order the plaintiff to pay your costs. That's a crap shoot though and should be avoided if possible.
 

mohawk001

Regular Member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
113
Location
Sierra Vista, Arizona, USA
I know that Virginia has a 1-person consent law to recording: § 19.2-62.2

"2. It shall not be a criminal offense under this chapter for a person to intercept a wire, electronic or oral communication, where such person is a party to the communication or one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to such interception."

And I know this has nothing to do with open carry. But my professor at GMU told me today i could not record him giving us questions for a video (voice recording) because it is illegal to record and he can go to the GMU lawyers and sue anyone that does this. I know GMU is a state institution and should follow state laws, but then again they have their own exception in our VA codes not allowing lawful gun owners to carry inside of academic buildings. Does anyone know if there is a different law that does not allow us to record professors? Thanks!

I guess if you want to persue it, you could ask him to show you where it's illegal since the state law says it's not. He should know the schools rules and regs and if he's going to use them against you then he should be able to back it up by telling/showing you where it is. You could also go to another administrator at the school if you want. Let's be honest, just because he's a professor doesn't mean he's always telling the truth or lacking of the truth himself.
 
Last edited:

mk4

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
548
Location
VA
The OP just needs a stealthier voice recorder. The prof can't threaten or say anything about something he doesn't know about... ;-)
 

skidmark

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
10,444
Location
Valhalla
My highly biased opinion is It All Depends On To What Purpose You Are Recording.

Ever since the invention of shorthand students have been "recording" lectures to aid in further study and in preparation for examinations. There are today literally thousands of courses you can take for credit that consist of viewing/listening to a recording of a professor's lecture from some time in the past.

You get into intellectual property rights if you intend to or accidentally make money because of the recording. (I have no idea how that applies to the bartering of goods/services for access to your "study notes".)

Instead of arguing with the professor you could (A) go ahead and audio record him and see if he catches on and if so what he doers about it, or (B) take his threat to sue you to his Department Chair and the Dean of Students and the University Provost as well as the Faculty Senate. See also the Academic policy item #8 at http://universitypolicy.gmu.edu/code-of-ethics.html . His threat sounds to me to be a huge violation.

stay safe.
 

riverrat10k

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
1,472
Location
on a rock in the james river
Record everything that may impact you. I record county officials all the time with a hidden voice recorder.

One guy lied to me later; I played his voice back to him over the phone. I think he complained to his supervisor about it.

He has been transferred out of the dept.
 
Last edited:

user

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
2,516
Location
Northern Piedmont
The reason they say that is because they want to preserve their copyright to prevent someone else from publishing what they've said before they do. It's not copyrightable unless and until it becomes a "fixed expression in a tangible medium." As long as it's just words in the air, there's no copyright.

By the way, any relation to Mary Galarza, who was at the time I last knew her, living in Colonial Beach?
 
Last edited:

tkd2006

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2010
Messages
85
Location
, ,
Well i see 2 things you could go with here. First is take in a recorder and set it on your desk and do not turn it on, when he comes by and says you need to turn it off pick it up and place it your shirt pocket and continue on with your day. Second is you could always carry in 3 or 4 cds and ask him what if he has already been recorded would he still sue you. Both of these show no admission of recording him but it would yank his chain a bit.
 

skidmark

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
10,444
Location
Valhalla
... but it would yank his chain a bit.

I always thought there was a difference between yanking someone's chain and poking them with a sharp stick. IMHO your suggestions fit more into the second category.

But, in either case, why take that route?

Comply with his demand that he not be recorded, which means his threat worked regardless of whether it had a legal leg to stand on or not. Take his threat to the folks in charge of dealing with professors who make threats they probably should not be making because of University policy and probably cannot carry out with any degree of success. Which to do?

stay safe.
 
Top