Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Wethersfield 14 JUN 12 hearing --- any thoughts on cases?

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838

    Wethersfield 14 JUN 12 hearing --- any thoughts on cases?

    I heard the guy , 80+yrs old, who shot at a squirrel .. never charged with anything .. but they took his license away.

    A cop testified and said the thought he was mentally incompetent ... what an goof...like he's qualified..and the old man's lawyer said nothing (no objection) to that statement...but said that just give it the weight it deserves (at least she said that .. she was clearly not paying attention during the cop's testimony) in closing arguments.

    The guy won his case but it was a total joke and waste of time.

    I did get to speak to Knapp .. he's an idiot who flip-flops and lied (I hate liars) to me ; but I made/prepared another objection set and filed it during the hearing time period...I'm sure he'll try to ignore my filing but I got a response out of him before, I can do it again...he'll have to dismiss my case or agree that suitability is not required.

    What is it with old guys, they like to shoot at varmints ! I got my father a small caliber pistol just for that purpose .. plink plink plink lol

    The old guy at the hearing did get lucky, the cops could have charged him with several gun offenses but decided not to...his neighbor who called the police is a real winner as he does the same thing, shooting varmints ...

  2. #2
    Regular Member KIX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    960
    Well, I told you how yours was going to go down. Where are you going to go next? What happens with the docs you submitted from here?

    Regarding the attorney in question.... Rachel obviously did her job, her client got to keep his permit!

    You left early.... there was a few doozies in there. Next month will be hectic though, three hearings!

    Newington was real interesting, especially given the thread we have about sealed records. Newington actually got up there and said flat out that they can't comment because the records were sealed (and they also didn't have any other officers present).

    I will be researching the case used to allow testimony from memory and not using records soon. My records are in my backpack and I just got in the door. I'll either dig up the other thread or start one with the case in question.

    It was indeed educational today.

    Jonathan
    www.ctpistolpermitissues.com - tracking all the local issuing authority, DPS and other insanity with permit issues
    www.ctgunsafety.com - my blog and growing list of links useful to gun owners (especially in Connecticut).

    Rich B: My favorite argument against OC being legal in CT is "I have never seen someone OC in CT".
    I have never seen a person drink tea from a coke bottle while standing on their head, that doesn't mean it is illegal.

  3. #3
    Regular Member brk913's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Plainville, CT
    Posts
    370
    Quote Originally Posted by KIX View Post
    Newington actually got up there and said flat out that they can't comment because the records were sealed
    Technically they are not even allowed to acknowledge the existance of such records...did the person get their permit?
    Member:, NRA Patron Life, NSSF, CCDL, CT Carry, MRPC and Bell City
    NRA Certified Instructor, Chief Range Safety Officer - Basic Pistol, Home Firearm Safety, Metallic Cartridge/Shotgun Shell Reloading - www.ctpistolpermit.com

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    West Haven
    Posts
    87
    Quote Originally Posted by brk913 View Post
    Technically they are not even allowed to acknowledge the existance of such records...did the person get their permit?
    I not sure about ct law but i have document from nyc that is very clear about it. Sealed is sealed otherwise it should be called partially sealed.

  5. #5
    Regular Member Rich B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    North Branford, Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    2,910
    Quote Originally Posted by IH8SPM View Post
    I not sure about ct law but i have document from nyc that is very clear about it. Sealed is sealed otherwise it should be called partially sealed.
    Sealed is not the same as what is being referred to here. This is 'erasure'.

    Connecticut law is crystal clear on this as well.
    Last edited by Rich B; 06-15-2012 at 02:39 PM.
    Connecticut Carry is dedicated to advancing and protecting the fundamental civil rights of the men and women of Connecticut to keep and bear arms for self defense of themselves and the state as guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Constitution of Connecticut.

    Join us and discuss the issues: http://ctcarry.com/Forum

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    Quote Originally Posted by KIX View Post
    Well, I told you how yours was going to go down. Where are you going to go next? What happens with the docs you submitted from here?

    Jonathan
    Well, its a set of objections, similar to what you saw with the addition of their questionnaire where I wrote OBJECTION on every line item ... this is what Knapp said he needed (so my trip was not wasted per se).

    If they don't rule on the objections, then I'll be at the next meeting ... now I did file a foia request to Weston, CT asking them for documents in respect to this video:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UX4njed_FUY

    Looking for their rifle & vest documentation ... OMG they are crying over this & already called DESPP over this request .. I told them comply with FOIA act or get sued per 42 USC 1983 .... threatening them with a FIC case just makes them laugh ...

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    Quote Originally Posted by KIX View Post

    You left early.... there was a few doozies in there. Next month will be hectic though, three hearings!

    Jonathan
    I would liked to stay but I other pressing business ... those hearing judges are a little bit sanctimonious, huh?

  8. #8
    Regular Member KIX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    960
    Quote Originally Posted by brk913 View Post
    Technically they are not even allowed to acknowledge the existance of such records...did the person get their permit?
    Yes.
    www.ctpistolpermitissues.com - tracking all the local issuing authority, DPS and other insanity with permit issues
    www.ctgunsafety.com - my blog and growing list of links useful to gun owners (especially in Connecticut).

    Rich B: My favorite argument against OC being legal in CT is "I have never seen someone OC in CT".
    I have never seen a person drink tea from a coke bottle while standing on their head, that doesn't mean it is illegal.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    Quote Originally Posted by KIX View Post
    Yes.
    Anyone not get their permit who showed? (or an order for the permit to be issued I should say)

  10. #10
    Regular Member KIX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    960
    There were a few. I can give a tally when I check my notes (on the other laptop).

    If I remember, I'll post the tally tomorrow.

    Jonathan
    www.ctpistolpermitissues.com - tracking all the local issuing authority, DPS and other insanity with permit issues
    www.ctgunsafety.com - my blog and growing list of links useful to gun owners (especially in Connecticut).

    Rich B: My favorite argument against OC being legal in CT is "I have never seen someone OC in CT".
    I have never seen a person drink tea from a coke bottle while standing on their head, that doesn't mean it is illegal.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •