Republicans still out to impeach a Democrat in office for Nixon. Your response speaks volumes to the Republican way of thinking. Tit-for-tat much?
Nixon wasn't impeached. Clinton was.
What was your point again?
Republicans still out to impeach a Democrat in office for Nixon. Your response speaks volumes to the Republican way of thinking. Tit-for-tat much?
They have no obligation to turn the documents over. I didn't make the rules. Cheney did this with Enron before it's collapse, and it held-up. As I stated: I don't make the rules.
I get it, President Obama can't do anything right in the eyes of Republicans. Reading people b*tch and moan for nearly four years is one of those things that I enjoy, but I also wonder how a person can have so much complaining inside themselves. You don't like Obama, vote his a$$ out of office--good luck...hmm: Romney 2012! *sniggers*
They have no obligation to turn the documents over. I didn't make the rules. Cheney did this with Enron before it's collapse, and it held-up. As I stated: I don't make the rules.
I get it, President Obama can't do anything right in the eyes of Republicans. Reading people b*tch and moan for nearly four years is one of those things that I enjoy, but I also wonder how a person can have so much complaining inside themselves. You don't like Obama, vote his a$$ out of office--good luck...hmm: Romney 2012! *sniggers*
Only someone LOOKING for a racial bent would stop at these words.
"Homeboy" is not racist. It's used by people of all colors to talk about fellows from their own 'hood. Oops, sorry, I mean "neighborhood."
"Darkest time" may be dramatic in regards to our economy, but it is IN NO WAY racist, unless PURPOSELY used that way. I can't read the mind of the writer, but I certainly had no reason to ASSume it wasn't the everyday meaning.
A couple of words you used that are interesting: Homeboy; Darkest time--you have a slight racial bent in this whole matter. Not stating that your bias is likely rooted in the fact that a Negro is in the White House, but this type of nonsense bubbles from some place.
... I'm surprised that you apparently took offense at MAC702's use of these terms,...
We need to stop pussyfooting around with these silly "contempt" charges, and get down to the heart of the matter. The simple fact is that the highest offices of our Executive and Judicial branches are both guilty of violating several sections of 18 USC Chapter 115. Congress needs to grow a pair, and proceed under the guidelines delineated in this section of the US Code, with regard to investigation, sanction, and punishment...
They have no obligation to turn the documents over.
For those of you who're incapable of understanding U.S. Law on your own, here's something to get you started.
To wit: "But even when the privilege is applicable, it is qualified and can be overcome when Congress demonstrates it has a substantial need for the information it seeks. In this case, Congress is seeking relevant information from the Justice Department, which it has been trying to obtain for more than a year.
"At every turn, Attorney General Eric Holder has stonewalled and obstructed congressional investigators. He is withholding thousands of pertinent documents, using an internal investigation as cover. It was because of Holder’s persistent refusal to cooperate that Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., threatened to hold him in contempt.
"At the last minute, President Obama, who had claimed from the outset that he had no prior knowledge of the operation, asserted the privilege on Holder’s behalf, as only the president can invoke this important privilege."
"What possible legitimate basis – national security or otherwise – does Obama have to deprive Congress of the requested information? This is an arrogant and lawless cover-up that appears calculated to buy this administration time until after the November election. Republicans should not back down. Though it acts like it, this defiant administration is not above the law."
Perhaps those around here who're so quick to arrogantly and flippantly mimic their Dear Leader won't be so quick to post "sniggers" when Obama and Holder are in prison for their many crimes against our country.
Given the sad state of overly political correctness and lack of resolve throughout Congress and the Supreme Court, and by progressive/socialist/Marxist/communist design, that'll likely never happen. The best we can hope for is that those over whose eyes the wool has been pulled finally take a look at the clue bird that's been crapping on their shoulder and grown a brain.
As P.T. Barnum said, "There's a sucker born every minute." Fortunately, naivety can be overcome through education. Sadly, too few blind followers of Obama and other ear-tickling progressives possess enough genuine knowledge of political history and are thus incapable of recognizing, much less admitting their folly.