Thread: Court Carry: documentation
Cliff notes for those of you without PDF access...
This joint administrative order from the four chief judges of the 2nd judicial district court (Washoe/Reno/Sparks) orders no weapons of any kind except LEOs performing duties, orders searches of persons entering, orders removal of persons declining consent to search, and orders "persons in violation" to be held in contempt.
It's a clear-cut run around state pre-emption and nice evidence that they have a policy of depriving people of their civil rights. Only the state can regulate possession of firearms. You can't be held in contempt of a court order if you've never been served the order.
Am I a "person in violation" if I show up to file my pleading with my Glock on my hip? If I am unarmed but decline consent to search? What a complete crock.
Last edited by Yard Sale; 06-26-2012 at 12:52 PM.
Last edited by OC-moto450r; 08-02-2012 at 06:25 PM. Reason: photo insert
Just another example of judges making law. They have ignored their oath of office and need to be impeached.
Life member GOA (and NRA). Member SAF, NAGR.
The sign posted by OC-moto450r says: "By direction of the Nevada Supreme Court..." Have I been asleep sometime and missed the ruling/case by the Nevada Supreme Court that "directs" such action?
Anyway, it's been my experience that judges do whatever the hell judges want to do. North Las Vegas Municipal Court Judges are a prime example. They have established rules for that court and its administrative surrounds that are so onerous that one might as well already be in jail when they show up at the court-house to conduct any type of business. And... when the staff there are questioned about the lunacy of such orders, they simply reply that the judges have ordered it and that's the way things are here.
Chemical and biological weapons are A-OK !
Gun Owners of America