Bellum_Intus
Regular Member
Doesn't it make you wish people were just less stupid? More sensible? I tell my kids all the time, the only problem with this world is the people in it. LOL.
haha! Sometimes...
--Rob
Doesn't it make you wish people were just less stupid? More sensible? I tell my kids all the time, the only problem with this world is the people in it. LOL.
lol nice! cheapest of all mods then! i didnt think about stopping by a skate shop i dont even think we have one around here anymore, ill haveto look into that, thanks for the tip!
The stuff I ended up getting is "clear", but ends up being a little white-ish on the gun. It's see through so I figured it would be less obvious. I think maybe I'd prefer the solid black, but it's not ugly. Maybe tonight I'll take a pic and post it so you can see.
I had almost the same experience at the El Paso County courthouse! hah! Mine was a knife in a backpack.. same result, he gave me the knife to take back to my car at the exit .. rofl..
--Rob
So you are both going out of your way to intentionally break the law and harrass the local constabulary, to the point that you are trying to get attention and start a "situation" in the middle of thier home turf??
Wow, and you all accuse me of crazy stuff...
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc&feature=related
This video sums up why I feel the way I do. Don't talk to police. Only what is required by law. Nothing more. You just never know. It's really long, but it's good.
Anything you say can and will be used AGAINST you. Nothing you say can be used FOR you. Thank that through.
I've seen that one.. not bad advice I suppose.. hope I never have to use the advice
--Rob
You're joking right?
It's called I forgot it was there, and the LEO was very cool about it and let me take it back to my car.. wasn't intentional anything..
I seriously hope you were kidding..
--Rob
And I believe you.. just SHOCKED that i've OC'd in Colorado for 10 years and have never had anything happen to me.. and I hear 'horror stories' .. I'm trying to figure out what the difference is..
Rob, I am kidding.
But I also know that I read in the paper often enough that somebody forgot he had a handgun in his carry on bag as he went through security...nobody ever buys that he "forgot."
I really do think that you are a decent guy, and I promise to not hate you simply because you will be wearing a badge. Just promise me that when you get that shiny badge you won't hate us just cause we don't.
That's my point.
Ok .. whew.. lol
But yes, it was a forgot..
And.. *IF* I ever get sworn, I won't bother any OC'ers.. heh.. really..
--Rob
But will you stand idly by and watch a fellow badge hassle a OC? No insinuation's on my part just a question.
Was it me?I seem to remember a certain outspoken member hear go off on such a statement, we'll see if he speaks up.
There is no requirement that they have to make contact. Where does it say they can't simply observe and report?I'm not going to flame ya Rob. (at least not intentionally)
Yes, if they get a call they have to respond. What is wrong with responding as you suggest, with a "hey, how are ya?" "Good, and you?" There is NO requirement that they detain, search, seize, demand id, or interrogate anyone.
Was it me?
How do you make the determination a person is baiting? Unless they outright say I am OC'ing to get stopped, how do you come to the conclusion that that is what they are doing? Even if they are baiting I personally don't have a problem with it. If someone is willing to intentionally take all that can come with a negative encounter for the purpose of correcting inappropriate behavior by law enforcement then go right ahead. Not to mention that whether an OC'er is baiting or not the fact remains that the officer chose to violate a citizens rights. So who is in the wrong here? The person lawfully carrying a firearm regardless of intent or the officer that decided they don't care about the law and how dare a mere citizen challenge their authority?
Was it me?
There is no requirement that they have to make contact. Where does it say they can't simply observe and report?
As to the video in the OP. It doesn't appear that he was baiting and I feel that he handled the encounter very well. He stood his ground without getting belligerent with the officer. Just because he has video of the incident doesn't mean he was intentionally baiting. I carry a voice recorder and am looking into video for my car/bike and possibly a video pen. I feel that any encounter has the potential to turn bad. Being able to produce as much evidence as I can of the encounter doesn't seem to me to be a bad idea.
As to baiting officers. How do you make the determination a person is baiting? Unless they outright say I am OC'ing to get stopped, how do you come to the conclusion that that is what they are doing? Even if they are baiting I personally don't have a problem with it. If someone is willing to intentionally take all that can come with a negative encounter for the purpose of correcting inappropriate behavior by law enforcement then go right ahead. Not to mention that whether an OC'er is baiting or not the fact remains that the officer chose to violate a citizens rights. So who is in the wrong here? The person lawfully carrying a firearm regardless of intent or the officer that decided they don't care about the law and how dare a mere citizen challenge their authority?
Was it me?
There is no requirement that they have to make contact. Where does it say they can't simply observe and report?
As to the video in the OP. It doesn't appear that he was baiting and I feel that he handled the encounter very well. He stood his ground without getting belligerent with the officer. Just because he has video of the incident doesn't mean he was intentionally baiting. I carry a voice recorder and am looking into video for my car/bike and possibly a video pen. I feel that any encounter has the potential to turn bad. Being able to produce as much evidence as I can of the encounter doesn't seem to me to be a bad idea.
As to baiting officers. How do you make the determination a person is baiting? Unless they outright say I am OC'ing to get stopped, how do you come to the conclusion that that is what they are doing? Even if they are baiting I personally don't have a problem with it. If someone is willing to intentionally take all that can come with a negative encounter for the purpose of correcting inappropriate behavior by law enforcement then go right ahead. Not to mention that whether an OC'er is baiting or not the fact remains that the officer chose to violate a citizens rights. So who is in the wrong here? The person lawfully carrying a firearm regardless of intent or the officer that decided they don't care about the law and how dare a mere citizen challenge their authority?
To some the actual process of OC'ing is baiting. Look, I have a gun.... Some guys are casual about it, others, well a little more militant. Very few opinions from the anti-gun crowd will be swayed from positive experiences IMO.
Back to the flaming....
No Sir, at least not to my recollection that time that comes to mind. I don't post much, but I observe as often as possible.
To some the actual process of OC'ing is baiting. Look, I have a gun.... Some guys are casual about it, others, well a little more militant. Very few opinions from the anti-gun crowd will be swayed from positive experiences IMO.
Back to the flaming....
Agreed. But it's not just the anti's that are against it. Most of the negativity against OC comes from gun owners of the CC variety. To them there is absolutely no reason to OC and anyone that does is an idiot and asking for trouble. These people hurt us more than any video by someone posting a video of themself standing against an oppressive government.
FYI.. I don't have a CHP..
--Rob