Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Levin Supports UN Ban

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Davisburg, Michigan, United States
    Posts
    8,948

    Levin Supports UN Ban

    From Facebook MCRGO

    Michigan Coalition for Responsible Gun Owners

    about an hour ago


    Sen. Carl Levin has indicated in an e-mail to MCRGO Director John Jordan that he supports ratification of the United Nation's Arm Trade Treaty stating, "I support ratification of a strong and effective ATT, and I look forward to working with the administration and my Senate colleagues to achieve that goal."

  2. #2
    Regular Member StingMP9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Madison Hts-Carry M&P9mm CPL/NRA mem, Michigan, USA
    Posts
    101
    No surprise to me. His responses to my emails often are veiled anti-gun. He cosponsored the 1994 Ban. He is for "sensible" gun control. He shouldn't be in office.
    "Reason can never be popular. Passions and feelings can become popular, but reason will always remain the sole property of a few eminent individuals."
    Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

  3. #3
    Regular Member Outdoorsman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Genesee County, Michigan, USA
    Posts
    273

    Thumbs down

    He needed to be voted out years ago. Why, oh why, can't we have term limits for US Senators?!

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Wyandotte, Michigan, USA
    Posts
    456
    Quote Originally Posted by stainless1911 View Post
    From Facebook MCRGO

    Michigan Coalition for Responsible Gun Owners

    about an hour ago


    Sen. Carl Levin has indicated in an e-mail to MCRGO Director John Jordan that he supports ratification of the United Nation's Arm Trade Treaty stating, "I support ratification of a strong and effective ATT, and I look forward to working with the administration and my Senate colleagues to achieve that goal."
    Not a shocker. He typically supports causes that favor low life and undesirables. What he fails to take into account is that the overwhelming majority of people committing crimes with firearms will not be affected by this as they donít legally obtain their weapons.

    This will look good to the anti gunners and keep the continued vote of the leeches as it wonít have any real affect on them.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Wyandotte, Michigan, USA
    Posts
    456
    Quote Originally Posted by Outdoorsman View Post
    He needed to be voted out years ago. Why, oh why, can't we have term limits for US Senators?!
    +1

  6. #6
    Regular Member detroit_fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Monroe, Michigan, USA
    Posts
    1,196
    Quote Originally Posted by Outdoorsman View Post
    He needed to be voted out years ago. Why, oh why, can't we have term limits for US Senators?!
    Why oh why do the residents of MI, the majority of whom support the 2A, continue to elect 2 senators who are both 1000% anti-gun?

    Debbie is going to get re-elected again this year, i still don't understand how that is possible.
    If guns cause crime, all mine are defective- Ted Nugent

  7. #7
    Regular Member Yooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Houghton County, Michigan, USA
    Posts
    808
    At least here in the western U.P., we elect pro-gun republicans and democrats. When "shall-issue" was being debated in the years before passage, the house member for my district (a democrat) voted against it. Not because he was opposed to shall issue, he was opposed to all the GFZ's that were created in that particular bill. My current house rep (a republican) is a co-sponsor or hb5225...

    On the downside, we don't have enough votes up here to counter the anti-gun mentality of down state, which leads us to the Levin's and Stabenows...
    Rand Paul 2016

  8. #8
    Activist Member hamaneggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    warren, Michigan, USA
    Posts
    1,251

    Exclamation

    Quote Originally Posted by StingMP9 View Post
    No surprise to me. His responses to my emails often are veiled anti-gun. He cosponsored the 1994 Ban. He is for "sensible" gun control. He shouldn't be in office.
    Thats what he says in his replies to me whenever I contact him with a 2A request for support!It's like banging your head on a brick wall!My Reps,Levin,Levin and Stabenow DO NOT represent ME or any Constitutionally minded Citizen,and should be removed ASAP!
    Today JESUS would tell me to sell my coat and buy two Springfield XD Compact 45acp's!

    NRA LIFER,GOA,MOC Inc.,CLSD,MCRGO,UAW! MOLON LABE!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •