Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Tired of fighting liberals

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Joplin
    Posts
    30

    Tired of fighting liberals

    This is a post from one of my wife relatives.


    Been some posts on "gun control" since last Fri (Aurora) I watched Piers Morgan with Michael Moore (never a real fan before) But, the points he made, were amazing. More talk on Mental Health then guns MY biggest peev WHY do average or any citizen need an assault weapon? OR any machine gun??? Leave those to the military. If you gotta own a gun, let it be a hand gun

    Chris Rock has a good line in his comedy act Let those bullets cost $5,000.00 then the nuts will only be able to buy one NOT 3000+ I do not want a gun in my home I'd rather be shot then have to shoot someone. Have you ever accidently hit a dog while driving your car? It's the worse feeling in the world. I could not shoot a human or even hunt a animal. BUT to each his own except for the ones that do mass murders Thanks for reading my opinion Everyone has one. I don't believe in cramming it down any ones throat God Bless the USA


    I am just getting tired of dealing with ignorance. At the point of giving up!

  2. #2
    Regular Member Redbaron007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    SW MO
    Posts
    1,637
    Yep, it is getting tiresome.

    The King is now using the language that 'no criminal should own an AK47'. What's funny, is that most criminals (depending on their conviction) can't own one to begin with. He is just trying to drum more anti-rhetoric!
    "I can live for two weeks on a good compliment."
    ~Mark Twain

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    Quote Originally Posted by Redbaron007 View Post
    Yep, it is getting tiresome.

    The King is now using the language that 'no criminal should own an AK47'. What's funny, is that most criminals (depending on their conviction) can't own one to begin with. He is just trying to drum more anti-rhetoric!
    An he says soldiers should only have them -- so he is supporting Russia over US citizens because our army don't use AKs. He still supports hunting! What a commie.

  4. #4
    Regular Member Redbaron007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    SW MO
    Posts
    1,637
    Quote Originally Posted by davidmcbeth View Post
    An he says soldiers should only have them -- so he is supporting Russia over US citizens because our army don't use AKs. He still supports hunting! What a commie.
    Of course, if HIS army has rifles/pistols and the common man doesn't...it is much easier to lead/dictate.
    "I can live for two weeks on a good compliment."
    ~Mark Twain

  5. #5
    Regular Member Greg30-06's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    30
    People seem to forget how this country began( the American revolution, against a tyrannical and oppressive government) and why the second amendment was put in the constitution(so that if the government ever got to Big for their britchesthe people coulddefend their ideals and restore proper order to the country)

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Spfld, Mo.
    Posts
    430
    I think most of us are in the same boat, getting very sick and tired of being sick and tired on the issue.

    It's upsetting that many of these liberals are getting government money only to turn around and use that government money to influence elections, influence policy, and ultimately make more laws that only limit the law abiding people from being able to stand up against them.

    It's time that Missouri stop jumping on the bandwagon after other States take a stand and become a leader for a change...start with finding out of campaign donations are being made by individuals, groups, or businesses that are receiving government funds that influence their ability to function or operate. Solyndra is an example of this problem, get millions in gov't money, close the doors, destroy product and equipment, then turn around and donate millions to BHO's campaign.
    Last edited by REALteach4u; 07-29-2012 at 10:06 AM.

  7. #7
    Regular Member papa bear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    mayberry, nc
    Posts
    2,258
    well this is the reason that we have lost so much of our rights. the anti's are married to their emotions and can never get tired. they argue feelings and suto-science, where we argue logic and common sense, with actual facts to back us up. which they will never listen to. oh, they know the facts too. they choice to ignore them. because the main thing they want is control. here is a progressive mayor; http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1702896.html


    so keep up the good fight or we will find ourselves like the victims in Syria
    Luke 22:36 ; 36Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.

    "guns are like a Parachute, if you don't have one when you need it, you will not need one again"
    - unknown

    i you call a CHP a CCW then you are really stupid. period.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    Many gun control laws have their basis in a desire to keep blacks from obtaining firearms .. its been this way a long time .. people just don't like to talk about it. The NAACP is silent of this issue or actually supports gun control laws that limit black gun ownership. If the NAACP existed in the 1860's and 1870's blacks would they even be able to own guns today?

  9. #9
    Campaign Veteran skidmark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    North Chesterfield VA
    Posts
    10,682
    Quote Originally Posted by davidmcbeth View Post
    Many gun control laws have their basis in a desire to keep blacks from obtaining firearms ....
    First it was the African American, then the AmerInd, then the free African American, then the <insert feared immigrant group>, and finally it is anybody who is not a member of the ruling elite who know what is good for us in spite of what we may think.

    As has been the case from the beginning, gun control was never about guns and always about control. The anti-gun folks see a need to impose absolute control because they can not comprehend that a person might be able to refrain from doing something simply because they have decided not to behave that way, as opposed to there being a law against it. Stated a bit more basically - the anti-gun folks are honestly and deathly afraid that they would not be able to control themselves and if allowed to have a firearm they would start shooting any anyone and everyone who "made" them upset.

    Not-anti-gun folks see both control of behavior and responsibility for behavior as being directed by the individual from within -- probably influenced by values and a sense of self-respect that then is translated into respect of others. I'm not even going to mention the matter of tolerance - especially tolerance of things that are different.

    Anti-gun folks see a need for control to be imposed from outside the individual - probably influenced by the fact that as a group they seem unwilling and unable to control themselves. Now that might be a self-fulfilling situation that has created a viscious circle -- unable/unwilling to control themselves so they enact rules/laws to impose control which makes it less necessary to impose control from within so they see more need to impose control via the outside influence of rules/laws. Lather, rinse, repeat until you fall down completely dizzy from chasing your tail.

    There are times when I feel physically and/or mentally exhausted from fighting the liberals/anti-gun crowd. But I am part of a network of "fighters". I can drop back and gather my strength/recharge my batteries while someone else steps into the front rank. Sometimes we work collaboratively, much like the 17th-18th-19th century line of riflemen: Front rank - Fire! Rear rank - Advance! Front rank - Fire! Folks who were in the front rank reload or catch their breath while the fresh(er) troops step up to continue the fight. As those now-front-rank folks fire, they are then replaced as the refreshed trops step back up. Somewhere along the way we recruit new troops, trai them, and then plug them into the line.

    How anybody can not understand it is in fact a battle is beyound my comprehension.

    stay safe.
    "He'll regret it to his dying day....if ever he lives that long."----The Quiet Man

    Because stupidity isn't a race, and everybody can win.

    "No matter how much contempt you have for the media in all this, you don't have enough"
    ----Allahpundit

  10. #10
    Regular Member WalkingWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    12,279
    I am sorry but I don't see our problem being just with liberals or antis. We see it all the time "Yea I am for the second amendment, but I don't think we should have this or that, and do we really need to hunt with a bazooka."

    It seems to me that those people who are OK with government regulation even though they own firearms, are not really for the second amendment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •