• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

After this video Romney has my vote... atleast for now

SovereignAxe

SovereignAxe

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2011
Messages
791
Location
Elizabethton, TN
stainless1911 said:
Me too. Mitt is a piece of ****.

I am voting against Obama this term. Any vote other than for Mitt, is a vote for Obama. History shows that people who dont want Obama will vote him into office by wasting their vote on principal. It will happen this year too.
Click to expand...

And all of the liberals are telling me that any vote other than for Obama is a vote for Romney. Who am I to believe?
 
M

Mitchell

New member
Joined
Oct 14, 2008
Messages
276
Location
, ,
If he gets in he might get the message that us gun owners put him there and will not make changes. If we do not, the BSD there now will have nothing to loose but to put more gun control out there. He has been hounded for the last 3 years for MORE control. We have to choose the better man.
 
C

CoonDog

Regular Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
532
Location
Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA
detroit_fan said:
2012 is about 1 thing in my opinion, and that is control of the SCOTUS. If obama is reelected he will most likely be able to flip the SCOTUS to a liberal majority, and then we will see Heller and McDnald overturned.

I don't like Mitt, but I will vote for him because there is no way I want to risk a liberal majority SCOTUS.

I hope the rest of you at least consider that before you vote.
Click to expand...

Oh no, the sky is falling!!!

Sorry, not falling for that. This country is so far gone that there is no difference in the two parties anymore. I'm not going to support the charade and neither should you.
 
WalkingWolf

WalkingWolf

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2011
Messages
11,930
Location
North Carolina
CoonDog said:
Oh no, the sky is falling!!!

Sorry, not falling for that. This country is so far gone that there is no difference in the two parties anymore. I'm not going to support the charade and neither should you.
Click to expand...

LOL, can we get a chorus of "I'm mad as hell and I am not going to take it anymore"

I think it is fine you not supporting the charade, but for myself I am still voting for Romney. I will not lower myself to tell anyone else how to vote, even if they are voting for the moonbat.
 
M

MrOverlay

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
186
Location
Olive Hill, Kentucky, USA
I doubt that a third party candidate, if elected to President, could effectively govern. He/she would have no "party" in congress to operate with. I doubt that a democrat or a republican would be anxious to work hand in hand with a third party candidate.

Now this might not be bad, as stalemate might be the end result, but I doubt much would be accomplished even if it was what we believe to be positive.

Glad to listen as to why I am wrong
 
WalkingWolf

WalkingWolf

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2011
Messages
11,930
Location
North Carolina
MrOverlay said:
I doubt that a third party candidate, if elected to President, could effectively govern. He/she would have no "party" in congress to operate with. I doubt that a democrat or a republican would be anxious to work hand in hand with a third party candidate.

Now this might not be bad, as stalemate might be the end result, but I doubt much would be accomplished even if it was what we believe to be positive.

Glad to listen as to why I am wrong
Click to expand...

I like stalemates, heck I like it when they are fighting like cats and dogs. Because when they get along we seem to get shafted. IMO that is why we have the Senate the House and the Executive branch, not so they can sing in harmony, but so they cannot shove it up our ---- well you know.
 
M

MrOverlay

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
186
Location
Olive Hill, Kentucky, USA
WalkingWolf said:
I like stalemates, heck I like it when they are fighting like cats and dogs. Because when they get along we seem to get shafted. IMO that is why we have the Senate the House and the Executive branch, not so they can sing in harmony, but so they cannot shove it up our ---- well you know.
Click to expand...

Understood. However, there are some things that actually do need to be done to save our economy. The uncertain business atmosphere we have today is not a good situation.
 
H

Haman J.T.

New member
Joined
Feb 5, 2008
Messages
1,245
Location
, ,
You have 2 choices.Obama-intent on socialist(gun banning,elimination of Rights,Freedom)) engineering,or Romney who governed an 80% Dem(super majority,veto proof) state legislature and is willing to change his wrong views for right ones! Obama cannot change his course(liberal-freedom eliminating-gun banning-SCOTUS judges)!! Not voting is self centered,selfish and cowardly! Grow some and do the best You can for This The Greatest Nation,founded on Freedom(to vote),Liberty(to vote) and Pursuit of Happiness(cannot be happy without putting Your best choice forward)!1CARRY ON!
 
smellslikemichigan

smellslikemichigan

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jun 16, 2008
Messages
2,307
Location
Troy, Michigan, USA
you have more than 2 choices. that's the problem is that people say that there are only 2 choices when there are clearly more than that. if everyone continues to vote for the same 2. nothing will ever change. a vote for EITHER of the 2 clowns is a vote for things to continue the same way they are now.
 
Last edited:
WalkingWolf

WalkingWolf

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2011
Messages
11,930
Location
North Carolina
smellslikemichigan said:
you have more than 2 choices. that's the problem is that people say that there are only 2 choices when there are clearly more than that. if everyone continues to vote for the same 2. nothing will ever change. a vote for EITHER of the 2 clowns is a vote for things to continue the same way they are now.
Click to expand...

It's always the individuals choice.
 
P

PistolPackingMomma

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2011
Messages
1,884
Location
SC
smellslikemichigan said:
you have more than 2 choices. that's the problem is that people say that there are only 2 choices when there are clearly more than that. if everyone continues to vote for the same 2. nothing will ever change. a vote for EITHER of the 2 clowns is a vote for things to continue the same way they are now.
Click to expand...

+1
 
TheQ

TheQ

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Messages
3,379
Location
Lansing, Michigan
If you believe Romney has any conviction in his views and won't compromise your gun rights as soon as it allows him to get something else on his agenda done via compromise, well...I have a bridge in the Straights of Mackinaw to sell you!

Your choice now is:

1) an incumbent who will give you a maximum of 4 more years of gun control.
2) This Romney guy who could be there up to 8 years of gun control, will make the "pro-gun" party look bad while doing it, and will make it harder for a real freedom candidate to run in 2016.

I'll vote for neither before I'll vote for either of them!

Oh...and if you're looking to SCOTUS for your election choice, a lot of people did that with Bush. One word: Roberts.

I'll check the box for Gary Johnson (or Gary E. Johnson of Texas if Gary Johnson can't make the ballot because of "sore loser")...and so will my wife.

It's too bad our true champion didn't make it: Ron Paul.

Go ahead, vote for your "plastic man": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPkCbjcXa6I
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top