• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

UN ATT Killed - for those who hadn't heard

Bellum_Intus

Regular Member
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
540
Location
Rush, Colorado
It's dead! (for now)

Full story here:

http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/articles/2012/nra-stops-un-arms-trade-treaty.aspx

During the past week, it became increasingly possible that the Conference would fail to come to an agreement on draft language. On Thursday, the Conference President produced yet another draft of the ATT in an effort to salvage the process. The new draft, like previous ones, was wholly incompatible with the Second Amendment rights protected by our Constitution.

The proponents of the treaty have goals that are clearly at odds with the American Constitution. Their refusal to remove civilian arms from the treaty was one major issue that led to the breakdown in negotiations. The U.S. delegation made it clear that they could not move forward with the language as it had been drafted.

While this conference has failed to complete a treaty, the proponents will not give up. It is likely that a new conference will be held in the future and NRA will continue to fight to protect the rights of American gun owners.

NRA maintains its steadfast opposition to any treaty that includes civilian arms in any way. NRA will continue to work with our allies, particularly in the U.S. Senate, to insure that the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is not threatened by this or any future international treaty.

-Rob
 

rushcreek2

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2010
Messages
909
Location
Colorado Springs. CO
I think the handwriting on the Senate wall was pretty clear to Obama.

Afterall........Obama believes he will have more "flexibility" after the elction...................

Actually he will . He can choose another career path.
 

Bellum_Intus

Regular Member
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
540
Location
Rush, Colorado
I think the handwriting on the Senate wall was pretty clear to Obama.

Afterall........Obama believes he will have more "flexibility" after the elction...................

Actually he will . He can choose another career path.

Funny how his comment to the Russian President didn't make more press.. hmm.. yeah..

IMO, we shouldn't sign a UN ANYTHING anymore.. nothing, nada.. In fact, we should just bow out of that useless organization..

--Rob
 

Wolfstanus

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
126
Location
Colorado springs
I'm so happy I could dance.

VictoryMeme.png





On another note.

I think they will revise it to allow only bolt actions/hunting shotguns. And be 5 rounds max. The UN is pretty useless these days.
 

Maine Expat

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2012
Messages
235
Location
Ukraine & Bangor Maine
Funny how his comment to the Russian President didn't make more press.. hmm.. yeah..

IMO, we shouldn't sign a UN ANYTHING anymore.. nothing, nada.. In fact, we should just bow out of that useless organization..

--Rob

Bow out? Lets boot em out! And take our support money with us too.

Don't let the pressure off your Senators either. Keep after em to "just say NO!" to the UN.
 

M-Taliesin

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2011
Messages
1,504
Location
Aurora, Colorado
Howdy Folks!
This is precisely why I didn't get all knickers in a bunch over the proposed treaty. First, the American delegation to the UN would have needed to support the thing, and they didn't. Even if it had passed UN muster, it would then require a 2/3 approval by the Senate. That ain't likely to happen. And those are only two quick examples of why I wasn't terribly concerned.

That isn't the same as saying we do not need vigilance. Sure, we gotta keep an eye on stuff anti's try to foist upon the American people. But I have a great deal of confidence in the American people to counter such feldercarb with stiff resistence.

This is a really great nation, and the way it was set up by our founding fathers wasn't anything short of brilliant. No one man, nor one party, nor one ideology, nor one President, nor one majority of one or the other party in the Senate is enough to muscle something through. Checks and balances is a terrific concept and has kept us out of some real bad issues before, and is doing it now. It will prevail again.

All I can say about the defeat of ATT is.............. HUZZAH!

Blessings,
M-Taliesin
 

mahkagari

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2009
Messages
1,186
Location
, ,
I'm so happy I could dance.

VictoryMeme.png


Is that Freddie Mercury? I'm suddenly in the mood to buy Sarah Brightman's cover of "Who Wants to Live Forever?" from the Highlander soundtrack.

First, the American delegation to the UN would have needed to support the thing, and they didn't. Even if it had passed UN muster, it would then require a 2/3 approval by the Senate. That ain't likely to happen. And those are only two quick examples of why I wasn't terribly concerned.

<snip>

This is a really great nation, and the way it was set up by our founding fathers wasn't anything short of brilliant. No one man, nor one party, nor one ideology, nor one President, nor one majority of one or the other party in the Senate is enough to muscle something through. Checks and balances is a terrific concept and has kept us out of some real bad issues before, and is doing it now. It will prevail again.

Gods, you are SOOOO naive M-T!! Don't you know that the president wields omnipotent emperorlike powers and can press his agenda to make Congress dance to whatever tune he pleases? Besides, he's not even the real threat when it comes to the UN! That Secretary of State of his has the REAL power! Whatever thought enters her Popeye's special head is LAW! C'mon! Grow up! Remove the scales from your eyes and smell the coffee! Turn your head and cough!
 

M-Taliesin

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2011
Messages
1,504
Location
Aurora, Colorado
Gods, you are SOOOO naive M-T!! Don't you know that the president wields omnipotent emperorlike powers and can press his agenda to make Congress dance to whatever tune he pleases? Besides, he's not even the real threat when it comes to the UN! That Secretary of State of his has the REAL power! Whatever thought enters her Popeye's special head is LAW! C'mon! Grow up! Remove the scales from your eyes and smell the coffee! Turn your head and cough!

Howdy Pard!
Yeah, what was I thinking!
Still, there are more of us than of them!
The President and Secretary of State are only 2 people.
We number in the millions.
And we vote!

Blessings,
M-Taliesin
 

mahkagari

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2009
Messages
1,186
Location
, ,
Who wants to live forever,
When love must die?
So touch my tears with your lips,
Touch my world with your fingertips,
And we can have forever...
 

Bellum_Intus

Regular Member
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
540
Location
Rush, Colorado
Important!

A letter was drafted by Senator Moran and signed by 51 Senators, the letter in opposition was sent to the President.. Below are the signers, note that neither Mark Udall (D, CO) nor Micheal Bennet (D, CO) signed the letter.. VOTE THEM GONE!

Bennet is up for re-election in 2017
Udall in 2015

Darn..

Full letter here: http://moran.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=9cd86202-9498-47ca-8b8d-534bf60b52f7

The letter was signed by U.S. Senators Lamar Alexander (R-TN), Kelly Ayotte (R-NH), Max Baucus (D-MT), John Barrasso (R-WY), Mark Begich (D-AK), Roy Blunt (R-MO), John Boozman (R-AR), Richard Burr (R-NC), Bob Casey (D-PA), Dan Coats (R-IN), Tom Coburn (R-OK), Thad Cochran (R-MS), Susan Collins (R-ME), Bob Corker (R-TN), John Cornyn (R-TX), Saxby Chambliss (R-GA), Mike Crapo (R-ID), Jim DeMint (R-SC), Mike Enzi (R-WY), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Dean Heller (R-NV), John Hoeven (R-ND), Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX), James Inhofe (R-OK), Johnny Isakson (R-GA), Mike Johanns (R-NE), Ron Johnson (R-WI), Jon Kyl (R-AZ), Mike Lee (R-UT), Joe Manchin (D-WV), Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Jerry Moran (R-KS), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Ben Nelson (D-NE), Rand Paul (R-KY), Rob Portman (R-OH), Mark Pryor (D-AR), Jim Risch (R-ID), Pat Roberts (R-KS), Marco Rubio (R-FL), Jeff Sessions (R-AL), Richard Shelby (R-AL), Olympia Snowe (R-ME), Jon Tester (D-MT), John Thune (R-SD), Pat Toomey (R-PA), David Vitter (R-LA), Jim Webb (D-VA), and Roger Wicker (R-MS).

--Rob

PS.. I guess this letter Mark Udall sent me back was just BS.. (dated 5/11/12)

Dear Robert,


Thank you for contacting me regarding the International Arms Trade Treaty and the Second Amendment Sovereignty Act of 2012 (S.2205). I appreciate your taking the time to express your specific views. On March 19, 2012 the Second Amendment Sovereignty Act was referred to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations for review. While I am not a member of this panel, rest assured I will keep your thoughts in mind as Congress considers this bill.

As you know, the Second Amendment provides for the right to bear arms for lawful purposes and responsible gun ownership is part of our way of life in the West. I believe that any legislation impacting constitutional rights requires thorough examination and I am committed to protecting the rights of citizens to own firearms for personal protection, hunting, collecting or for other legal purposes.

In 2008, the General Assembly of the United Nations announced plans to establish a committee to discuss a possible treaty aimed at reducing the number of weapons that end up in the hands of illegal brokers and smugglers. The proposed outline for the treaty would target trade between nations, not trade within a nation. While no text has yet been proposed for the treaty and it is not expected to be drafted until 2012, I sent a letter in July 2011 to President Obama and Secretary Clinton expressing my belief that the treaty cannot in any way subordinate the Second Amendment to the Constitution.

As your U.S. Senator, I have the constitutional obligation to advise and consent on any and all treaties, a duty I take seriously. If this treaty is drafted and comes before the U.S. Senate for debate, you can be sure that I will remember your thoughts and concerns.

I will continue to listen closely to what you and other Coloradans have to say about matters before Congress, the concerns of our communities, and the issues facing Colorado and the nation. My job is not about merely supporting or opposing legislation; it is also about bridging the divide that has paralyzed our nation's politics. For more information about my positions and to learn how my office can assist you, please visit my website at www.markudall.senate.gov.


Warm regards,

Signature

Mark Udall
U.S. Senator, Colorado
 
Last edited:

since9

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
6,964
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
A letter was drafted by Senator Moran and signed by 51 Senators, the letter in opposition was sent to the President.. Below are the signers, note that neither Mark Udall (D, CO) nor Micheal Bennet (D, CO) signed the letter.. VOTE THEM GONE!

Bennet is up for re-election in 2017
Udall in 2015

Darn..

When I wrote them both about the UN ATT issue, Udall wrote me back about a whole bunch of pro-gun jibber-jabber. Now I know for a fact he's a lying POS. Bennet didn't write me back at all, so they're both pieces of...

What do you expect? They're Democrats. Out of the 51 Senators who signed it, I believe only 3 or 4 Dems were among them. The rest of the un-American anti-Constitutional leeches deserve a free ticket home, where they can just park their de-voted butts for the rest of their natural days.
 

mahkagari

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2009
Messages
1,186
Location
, ,
When I wrote them both about the UN ATT issue, Udall wrote me back about a whole bunch of pro-gun jibber-jabber. Now I know for a fact he's a lying POS.

I'm missing something. Did Udall vote for the treaty?
 

mahkagari

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2009
Messages
1,186
Location
, ,
Read my post.. he did not sign the letter opposing it.. If he didn't sign opposing it.. what does that leave? ...

Working instead of grandstanding?

That he didn't participate in a 8 1/2 x 11 rally doesn't mean he was "lying" about his position on the treaty.
 

Bellum_Intus

Regular Member
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
540
Location
Rush, Colorado
Working instead of grandstanding?

That he didn't participate in a 8 1/2 x 11 rally doesn't mean he was "lying" about his position on the treaty.

Anyway, My vote will not be for Mr. Udall in 2015.. I don't think it's grandstanding, had Sen Moran not drafted the letter of opposition, the Treaty may well have been signed..

--Rob
 

carolina guy

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
1,737
Location
Concord, NC
Glad it is dead (for now...socialists ALWAYS come back again later)...however, I think people need to keep this kind of treaty in perspective...

1) Even if it gets agreement from the US delegation
2) Even if it gets signed by the Prez
3) Even if it gets approval by 2/3 of the Senate

A treaty is still subordinate to the Constitution. Period.
 
Top