carolina guy
Regular Member
Don't bet, I think you would lose.
From earlier thread on OCDO:
See post #9
http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/s...am-county-oc-question-about-registration-slip
So who wants to be a test case?..:uhoh:
Ok. I am still willing to admit that I am being hard headed on this, but I am asking if someone can show me a current link or reference to the law as it is currently on the books in North Carolina.
Post #9 gives the original state law as "House Bill 566 in 1935, Chapter 157" ... no disputing that. However, when you review Chapter 157 as it is currently written, it makes absolutely no mention of "Durham county" , "firearm", "pistol" or any other key operating word or phrase from the original legislation (as reported in bc.cruisers first link) other than "registration" referring to the sale of bonds. In fact, I believe this is exactly the correct chapter of NCGS as it has this as the opening Title:
§ 157-1. Title of Article.
This Article may be referred to as the Housing Authorities Law. (1935, c. 456, s. 1.)
So...we have the historical reference...but nothing contemporary. Since the state maintains a listing of other laws from 1935 (look to the end of each section and chapter, and you will see the legislative history)...this one should be in place as well-- but it is not.
OK carolina guy, read on to your heart's content. First will get you the 1935 law, 2nd the state misdemeanor penalty, and 3rd the county ordinance assigning penalty. Current posted ordinances do not include the old stuff.
http://www.carolinashootersclub.com/threads/69992-Text-of-Durham-NC-gun-registration-law
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/Enacted...TML/BySection/Chapter_15A/GS_15A-1340.23.html
http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientId=12650
The url's for penalties are interesting, but not really important if there is no active state law to apply a violation. I would say that it is akin to seeing something like: "The following is the penalty schedule for illegally hunting Martian's during the Summer Solistice".
The burden of proof is on the one making the allegation. The Attorney General says the law is still on the books, but I have to cry foul. He provides no informatoin about the content, name, or location that one can find the law as it is currently enacted.