• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Defendant's Take On Dismissal of State v. Doutel

D

DDoutel

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2011
Messages
101
Location
Connecticut
I've just completed my latest post over at LiarCop.Com, for any interested in the Defendant's take on all of this. Rich Burgess over at Connecticut Carry has already posted his press release.

Any LEO's who frequent this board might be wise to take careful note of this case, as the ripples ("penumbras and emanations"??) will not be pretty.
 
Last edited:
S

Skinnedknuckles

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
108
Location
Connecticut
Even though any award you receive will unfortunately come from the taxpayers and not the miscreants, GO FOR IT!!!!!!!!!

Congratulations, even though as you have eloquently shown it should never have happened in the first place. It should not be allowed to happen again. Thank you.
 
davidmcbeth

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
Skinnedknuckles said:
Completely agree, but some personal financial pain for the "professionals" who screwed the pooch so profoundly in this case would be nice as well.
Click to expand...

In CT, if a 42 USC 1983 verdict results in an award; then the town needs to decide IF they wish to reimburse or cover the loss to the individual. They do not have to. This is a case where the town should clearly not cover the cops' activities because even a retard can tell that the arrest was unwarranted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top