• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Once Again Dudley brown Of The Gun Rights Is Sounding The Alarm

EMNofSeattle

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
3,670
Location
S. Kitsap, Washington state
Anybody know about InfoWars.com? Here's a 21 minute video that says the UN gun ban has been in the works since 1961 WITH the co-operation of the U.S.!![/size][/font]

Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyfkQkchlu4&feature=related

I know of infowars.com. they have near-zero credibility, they get some things right on occassion, but nearly all their strories are written through a lense of conspiracy theories.
 

EMNofSeattle

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
3,670
Location
S. Kitsap, Washington state
So I went and read the document showcased on infowars

The document that the previous poster put up from infowars, says Nothing about civilian arms. It exclusively details a plan for nuclear weapons disarmament and the reduction of standing armed forces in the devloped world and turning all international disputes and enforcement of international disputes to the UN, nothing in the full context of this document indicates a desire to completely disarm civilians, it exclusively refers to military armament, obviously I'm not a big fan of that either, but lets keep things in context, the story on that video was false in the sense that they took the entire report out of context.
 
Top