• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Can private property search you?

rapgood

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
598
Location
Stanwood, WA
<snip>
probably robbery (removing property by force from the owner while the owner is present meets the test, value of property stolen is irrelevant).

Close. In Washington, an act of theft does not rise to the level of being "robbery" unless the property is taken forceably from the person who is the owner (not merely present, but from his actual person). Otherwise, it is only theft of some degree, based upon the value of the property taken, or a special classification of theft, such as of a firearm, automobile, etc.
 

massivedesign

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Messages
865
Location
Olympia, Washington, USA
At safeco you are entering a venue, in which you paid for admission. Admission to the venue is contingent upon following certain rules.

Helping a friend move into his apartment complex (which grants him some additional rights as a resident on the grounds), doesn't even come close comparing to Safeco's policies.
 

papa bear

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
2,222
Location
mayberry, nc
Maybe he doesn't have the right to forcibly search the bag but his statement "that as long as he's on private property, he must either consent to have it searched, or leave immediately" is pretty much within the rights of a private property owner.

Like it or not, your presence on private property is by permission of the property owner. It can be revoked for pretty much any reason they want.

Frankly, I wouldn't choose to live in an apartment complex that required a security guard.

but as a renter, and it is not in the contract, is the one that owns the property now. as long as the contract is binding and active
 

Lovenox

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
538
Location
Olympia
Been in the security buisiness. In WA the security guard has no right to search. It is an illegal search and he should be fired for his actions. Security Guards in WA have no more authority than a civilian, unless that security guard is commissioned. I highly doubt that person was. Even if that person was, they still can NOT search you or your bags or property. If you ever have a next time with that person, I would tell them to pack sand, just make sure you do it in a tactical manner.

Remember, a security guard has no more authority than you or I as a civilian in WA State.


Does that include bounty hunters??
 

Difdi

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2010
Messages
987
Location
Seattle, Washington, USA
Lets stay away from the renters private property. They were not in the rental, they were outside unloading a Uhaul when they were approached.

That's actually an interesting legal possibility. CAN you be trespassed from the common areas of the apartment complex you pay rent/hold a lease in? If you are, does that bar you from entering or leaving your apartment, since you'd have to enter the area affected by the trespass order to get in or out? Or would the fact of the rental or lease override and negate the trespass order?

Can a trespass order be issued against an invited guest of a tenant without the permission of the tenant? Would it apply to the tenant's rented/leased apartment or just to common areas? If the latter, same question as above, how would you leave the apartment you are a guest in without committing a crime?

Close. In Washington, an act of theft does not rise to the level of being "robbery" unless the property is taken forceably from the person who is the owner (not merely present, but from his actual person). Otherwise, it is only theft of some degree, based upon the value of the property taken, or a special classification of theft, such as of a firearm, automobile, etc.

True. But I can't imagine anyone not grabbing the handles of their duffel bag if someone lunges in to steal it. And if the owner is holding the handles when the bag is stolen, that changes simple theft into robbery.
 
Last edited:

Aaron1124

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
2,044
Location
Kent, Washington, USA
That's actually an interesting legal possibility. CAN you be trespassed from the common areas of the apartment complex you pay rent/hold a lease in? If you are, does that bar you from entering or leaving your apartment, since you'd have to enter the area affected by the trespass order to get in or out? Or would the fact of the rental or lease override and negate the trespass order?

Can a trespass order be issued against an invited guest of a tenant without the permission of the tenant? Would it apply to the tenant's rented/leased apartment or just to common areas? If the latter, same question as above, how would you leave the apartment you are a guest in without committing a crime?



True. But I can't imagine anyone not grabbing the handles of their duffel bag if someone lunges in to steal it. And if the owner is holding the handles when the bag is stolen, that changes simple theft into robbery.

Right. I am pretty sure that any use of force used to acquire someone elses belongings is what turns a theft in to a robbery.
 

Jeff Hayes

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
2,569
Location
Long gone
I believe a verbal threat would change theft to robbery, actual battery is a no brainer. Remember there are several levels of theft and several levels of robbery.
 
Top