katsung47
Regular Member
picture compare with Madrid fire
Um... it was proven that the fire and heat did in fact cause the collapse of the building due to the fact that the impact of the aircraft removed the fire retardent insulation that had been sprayed on the support structure. With no insulation, the fire and heat from the burning jet fuel as well as the combustable materials in the structure itself was more then enough to cause further structural degridation which directly led to the collapse.
Mind you, this is a short explination of what happend but if you would like, I'm sure I can dig up alot more "official" documents reguarding the world trade center disaster.
Edit... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collapse_of_the_World_Trade_Center
the impact of the aircraft removed the fire retardent insulation that had been sprayed on the support structure.
The only evidence I need to question the government is the lack of evidence regarding the "plane" that "crashed" into the Pentagon. I don't know one way or another what happened at the WTC, but the idea that a large plane can hit the side of the Pentagon and leave no wreckage, but leave the contents of adjoining offices intact is preposterous.
The best conspiracy theories are the ones put out by the government.
Anyone who thinks the government is capable ----
picture compare with Madrid fire
As for there being no wreckage to recover in Shanksville, an aircraft constructed of thin aluminum diving into the ground at 600 mph? What would be left? I am a pilot and work around aircraft. You can just about put your finger through the skin of some.
The Windsor building also didn't suffer the impact of a jet flying into it at high speeds, if a 767 had blown into the Windsor building it would have collapsed that day. The Windsor building was ravaged by an electrical fire, where as the fires in the WTC were mainly chemical fires fueled by kerosene based jet fuel. the initial impact of the aircraft should have done plenty of damage on it's own. even had the WTC not collapsed it would've had to have been demolitioned.
so for example a
325 ton (empty) 747 wouldn leave no trace after an impact into the earth?
were not talking about laminate skin covered single prop engine planes, we are talking about an aircraft of extreme size. It will leave a trace of what it was!
Not according to the non-government expert ... oh, "the records burned" .. isn't that special.
Except it was a 757-222 which is maybe a third the size of a 747. with how fragile airplane bodies actually are, I doubt there'd be anything left, except for some aluminum shards and a couple steel widgets and maybe some engine components, there really wouldn't be anything resembling a piece of a plane though.
The lack of engines, engine impact marks on the ground, and engine impact marks on the side of the Pentagon illustrate something was amiss. The government's claim on the Pennsylvania crash is like saying that the impact pulverized the bodies and fuselage into fine dust that flew up into the wind and was carried out over the ocean never to be found. Or that the fire was so hot that it somehow incinerated every body part and bone as well as the fuselage of the aircraft and the liquified aluminum was never found.