Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Unlawful Wooster Ordanance

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Springfield, MO
    Posts
    203

    Unlawful Wooster Ordanance

    according to http://www.conwaygreene.com/Wooster/...-hit-h.htm&2.0 , Wooster still has a park ban ordnance on the books... Who's ass should I light a fire under to get this removed?

    Funny thing is, this was passed 4-21-08. Wasn't this AFTER the ORC preemption law went into effect?

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    307
    Quote Originally Posted by BriKuz View Post
    according to http://www.conwaygreene.com/Wooster/...-hit-h.htm&2.0 , Wooster still has a park ban ordnance on the books... Who's ass should I light a fire under to get this removed?

    Funny thing is, this was passed 4-21-08. Wasn't this AFTER the ORC preemption law went into effect?
    The law director has stated that it will not be enforced, and the local police are aware of that. City council is aware of the issue, but it has not been placed on the agenda. The public discussion session of city council meetings does not allow open discussion of issues not on the agenda. City council president has been informed there will be a request to place the matter on this agenda, and a specific request with a memorandum of law will be sent to the council member in charge of that issue in the near future. Both that council member and the council president are attorneys, and they will be able to understand from the memorandum of law that their choices are very limited. If any type of group action is needed to prompt them, there will be postings in both OCDO and OFCC forums.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Springfield, MO
    Posts
    203
    Roger that, thanks, Werz!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •