I agree and will be giving the judge a call to let the commie girl know my opinion of her opinion.
It appears as if the plaintiff's did not argue the right to practice with the firearm and the need to do this every 6 mos.
Nor of the fact (maybe case law did not exist) that the right to practice is part of the gun.
And the case highlights the need to attack the introduction of evidence at the board hearing. I have a current motion to exclude the town's questionnaire and other documents due to the fact that the town did not enter an appearance prior to their submission and that the questionnaire was completed and provided to the board by an unauthorized person.