We need to get low income housing out of the state. get rid of it, End of problem
Then where will I live? Oh, right, in a different country... Almost all of the Chinese own their homes outright. Figure it out... If you have a mortgage, it's because you're irresponsible and cannot afford to live like you're living. Just as with tax debt, a mortgage spends money from the future. It's is privatized deficit spending, and it WILL fail. You can't all be captain of the ship. Somebody has to do actual work. We're seeing the same problem on a larger scale; getting it MORE wrong on purpose will not solve anything. The poor are the ones most often victimized by criminals AND politicians. They need their guns more than anybody! Scorn them instead of bringing them the message oftruth, and you'll never have their vote. The attempt of this mentality to screw it's head so far up it's own ass that it will come back out the top.... Think about it, please. It won't work. Obama said in his debate that he wants to go after the cheap handguns... the only ones poor people can buy. Gosh, how dare there be a mass of poor people you've raped and pillaged so much they don't like you anymore... Obama is leveraging it, you're alienating it. Thats why he got 2 terms. You're trying to be a snob like him, but he's better at it and exposes how you made them poor, while you say "Well, yeah! Screw you poor people!" They already hate you, and you added more fuel to the fire? DUMB!
Anyway...
The Republican Party has made a consistent mistake. Follow the Power. Since dubyah went nutso on us, the entire party has realized how it can seize power. It's what we call a neo-con. It's really just Statism. But, the Democrats damn near invented Statism. RINOs. So, we've seen the Republican Party gravitate towards squishy flip-flopping stand-for-nothing losers as it tries to hang on to neo-con power. It naturally gravitates towards becoming more like the Democrats because they're both trying to be Statists, but the ability to differentiate them disappears as they both become the same thing. Statism disguised as moderation. A point equidistant between two extremist stupidities, is just an indecisive and irrational mix of those stupidities. It's not a good thing.
Republicans need to realize that they will always lose until they stand for something again. Their craving for the Statist power the Democrats already represent and have is taking away our interest in voting for them. They have to give up that lust for power and return to their Libertarian roots.
This is why Bogdanoff got kicked to the curb. She stabbed us in the back. So her no vote was replaced with a new no vote. So what? How does that change anything for us? That seat is a no vote just the same as it was two years ago. She got soft and screwed us. Then, she reaped what she had sown. The only consequence is for her. We neither gained or lost anything by her sorry ass getting punted.
You're looking at this all wrong, and the Republican Party better start paying attention to ME! SACK UP! TAKE A STAND FOR FREEDOM AND WE'LL VOTE FOR YOU AGAIN! But if we have to pick between two different forms of Statism, we're going to pick the one with, by far, the most experience; Democrats. Democrats have been extremist Statists for loner than I've been alive! Johnny-come-lately neo-cons got drunk on it, and now they can't stop. They suck at it. They're heavy handed and nobody falls for their approach.
This is an opportunity for Rights, not a setback. Educate the politicians that continuing to be pussies will only continue to lose support. Support Open Carry and get your constituency back! Take a stand for something worth a damn!