sudden valley gunner
Regular Member
Actually it is hypocrisy. Even rights have limits, such as when we can legally use our weapons. So this isn't your Constitutional right thing because it's not about her being able to carry if you want to go that way. It's about people who are using an excuse that they hate to have used against them. That is hypocrisy. If you can't see the pot calling the kettle black, then perhaps you are just a sheeple that you I'm sure hate to see running around. There are many forms of those also after all. If I see you going down the street, perhaps I will pull my gun on you since I do not know you. Who knows what you would do other than walk down my street after all. And I'm not the government, so I'm not taking away your rights. Only using mine based on what you might do next.
No it's not hypocrisy. And rights don't have limits....read the 9th and 10th amendments.
You are not separating the actions of public employees from the actions of private. They are two very distinct topics. Our constitutions at both the state level and the federal level are there to protect us from government and their street warriors. Not from the actions of individuals, we often legislate laws to do this, but I hold the opinion that common law is the best protection.
To address your straw-man argument that really has no correlation to what we are talking about , you pulling a gun on me for doing nothing but walking down the street. You are taking my liberties and threatening my rights away and threatening with force I know you are trying to use this as an analogy but you threaten me or others around me with lethal force I will respond in a way to protect myself and others from that threat. This is a common law right I have and nothing really to do with the actions of a lady who stopped a crime happening upon herself or from an officer taking things further than constitutionally allowed.
A man commits a crime upon a lady, she uses in my opinion the right amount of force to repel that crime is very different than a cop stopping me from engaging in my lawfully protect method of carrying my weapon openly. You see the perv was already committing a crime and possibly about to commit more, an OC'er is not committing a crime by OCing so there is no PC for a stop. Understand now?
Last edited: