Wonderful journalism, making the victim out to be the perp here as you read the article. Obviously the man reacted in self defense as far as the police were concerned. But I am wondering on what grounds they took his weapon? And the sensationalist reports from shoppers in the store....."reports of a shooting", when no shots were fired. Apparently comments in the article are stating other news agencies in the area are a bit more unbiased.
EDIT: Looks like the police report states they gave him back his gun, person claiming the man provoked the situation was the mother of the guy punching the CCWer in the mouth....a little biased to be sure.
Link to police report: http://www.ksat.com/blob/view/-/1753...ormat=rsss_2.0