Anonymouse
Regular Member
Well, global warming advocates claim their "science" is also peer-reviewed. By the way, The Heritage Foundation, while conservative, is not the end all and be all of conservatism. Their studies are just as valid as any study, even studies you cite. Your liberalism is showing.
Peer reviewed doesn't matter if the data was faked.
Never claimed to be conservative but the Heritage foundation is as valid as those that put out ID. Lol
None of it matters though because these studies are not proof of anything. These studies fall all over the map. That's the problem with soft sciences.
That's why your claim is bunk and the studies, which you haven't cited, are probably bunk as well.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2