jeremiahJohnson
New member
Perhaps they have to pass it so we can find out what's in it?:shocker:
Outstanding.
Perhaps they have to pass it so we can find out what's in it?:shocker:
couldn't they still require PP? so you go to police, get PP, then you can buy one legally, just don't have to register it. anyone selling a handgun would have to see a CPL or PP to sell to them.
For all of you beating the no compromise drum... it is known as incremental improvement. Removing the need for FFL purchase is one step further down the road to removing it altogether.
In 10 years, maybe.
Now that the legislature has passed some useless little gun bull, they will feel that the issue has been addressed. It will be a lot harder now to even get them to consider passing something of any real substance.
Ok, I thought that the boards would be gone, giving the authority to the SoS.
Incremental improvement is not the same as "two steps forward, two steps back". This and SB 59 look like nothing more than an attempt just to gain some individuals some political capital.For all of you beating the no compromise drum... it is known as incremental improvement. Removing the need for FFL purchase is one step further down the road to removing it altogether.
Incremental improvement is not the same as "two steps forward, two steps back". This and SB 59 look like nothing more than an attempt just to gain some individuals some political capital.