LV XD9
Regular Member
I'm pretty sure he was talking about taking action to protect the teller's life, not to protect the bank's money.
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
This comment from an anti just pisses me off
- Thread starter phoneguy
- Start date
I'm pretty sure he was talking about taking action to protect the teller's life, not to protect the bank's money.
OC for ME
Regular Member
The customer's money. I'm fairly confident that the bank does not keep its money in a teller drawer at your local branch.
I tried to be not-obvious about that. Kind of hoped most folks would relate more to those colored jerseys school kids are made to wear in PE class to designate which team they are assigned to.
But thanks for noticing. Be sure to pick up a lovely parting gift on your way out.
stay safe.
i know 100's of gun people
to include scores of IPSC and IDPA competitors. know how many I'd trust to walk alongside me, with their pistols out and ready? I can count them on my fingers, dude. However, it is a VERY bad precedent to allow "presumptive' charges/thoughts, when no actual criminal activity has occurred, so we are stuck with allowing inept, cowardly fools to carry, along with the 1 in 1000 guy who really does know what he's doing with that pistol.
to include scores of IPSC and IDPA competitors. know how many I'd trust to walk alongside me, with their pistols out and ready? I can count them on my fingers, dude. However, it is a VERY bad precedent to allow "presumptive' charges/thoughts, when no actual criminal activity has occurred, so we are stuck with allowing inept, cowardly fools to carry, along with the 1 in 1000 guy who really does know what he's doing with that pistol.
eye95
Well-known member
All I gotta say is wow!!
Some people may be well-schooled in HOW to use a firearm, but, after reading what they write, I really worry about WHEN they will use the firearm. I don't want to be anywhere near someone who can use the firearm well, but can't think his way out of a paper bag with six open ends.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.
<o>
Some people may be well-schooled in HOW to use a firearm, but, after reading what they write, I really worry about WHEN they will use the firearm. I don't want to be anywhere near someone who can use the firearm well, but can't think his way out of a paper bag with six open ends.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.
<o>
OC for ME
Regular Member
My initial (gut) reaction was to agree with you. Then I got to thinking, always dangerous according to my DW by the way, I'm just not into that whole mandate people to do 'X' thing.I tried to be not-obvious about that. Kind of hoped most folks would relate more to those colored jerseys school kids are made to wear in PE class to designate which team they are assigned to.
But thanks for noticing. Be sure to pick up a lovely parting gift on your way out.
stay safe.
YMMV
