The problem with SB59 is not whether it takes baby steps or giant steps forward with OC, it's that it takes BACKWARD steps with OC.
In my previous comment, I wasn't agreeing or disagreeing with the Bill. Really all I was saying is that:
Thread Created: Discussion SB59-Take (1):
Person "A": I support SB59 and hope it passes, because...
Person "B": I don't support SB59 and hope it dies, because...
Person "A": You're an idiot...
Person "B": No, you're an idiot...
Thread Locked
Thread Created: Discussion SB59-Take (2):
Insert Discussion SB59-Take (1)
.
.
.
Thread Locked
.
.
.
Each and everyone of us here, and elsewhere, may have reasons for agreeing or disagreeing on certain issues. i.e. Person "A" opinion(s) carries no more weight than Person "B" opinion(s).
I will admit, I do not support SB 59. However, it's not for reasons many may think. My reason(s) for not supporting the Bill are mine and mine alone. But just for reference, I don't have a serious problem if I needed, or was required, to CC in a PFZ. Do I think,
in my opinion, the requirement to CC is beyond retarded? Yes I do.