• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Turner told CT officials to obey constitution or die ... found not guilty of anything

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
http://www.greenwichtime.com/news/article/Acquitted-blogger-sues-state-officials-for-50M-4091422.php


HARTFORD -- A blogger who urged readers to "take up arms" against a Stamford legislator and other state officals is suing state government leaders for $50 million after being acquitted of threatening and inciting violence.

Harold "Hal" Turner, of North Bergen, N.J., filed the lawsuit in federal court in Newark, N.J., claiming he was falsely arrested, wrongfully imprisoned and maliciously prosecuted. A jury acquitted him last year.

Defendants referred questions to the Connecticut attorney general's office.

A spokeswoman for Attorney General George Jepsen declined to comment and said her office will respond to the allegations in court.

Turner couldn't be reached for comment Tuesday. There is no phone listing in his name.

Turner was arrested after a June 2009 blog posting suggesting Connecticut officials "obey the Constitution or die" and urging readers to "take up arms and put down this tyranny by force." He added that if authorities tried to stop his cause, "I suspect we have enough bullets to put them down too."

The posting was in response to legislation debated by state lawmakers that would have given lay people of Roman Catholic churches more control over parish finances. Turner believed the legislation flew in the face of the constitutional doctrine of separation of church and state. The bill had been withdrawn three months before his posting.

A state jury in Hartford acquitted Turner in September 2011 after he argued that his free speech rights were being trampled and there was never any violence against state officials.

At the time of his trial, Turner was serving a nearly three-year prison sentence for threatening judges in Illinois. He was released in October.

The defendants in the lawsuit include Gov. Dannel P. Malloy's general counsel, former state Sen. Andrew McDonald, and former state Rep. Michael Lawlor, now undersecretary for criminal justice police and planning at the state Office of Policy and Management. McDonald and Lawlor, who were co-chairman of the legislature's Judiciary Committee when the church bill was debated, declined to comment.

Other officials named in the lawsuit include Assistant State's Attorney Thomas Garcia, who prosecuted Turner, and state Capitol police officials.

Read more: http://www.greenwichtime.com/news/a...e-officials-for-50M-4091422.php#ixzz2E92jaNyv


Free speech case or 2nd amendment case or both?
 

Ca Patriot

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
2,330
Location
, ,
There is no "constitutional doctrine of seperation of church and state"

Other than that, sounds like he isnt even allowed to own or possess firearms.
 

Jack House

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
2,611
Location
I80, USA
Re: Turner told CT officials to obey constitution or die ... found not guilty of

That nitwit is darn lucky he ain't warming a cot in Gitmo.
Should he be grateful he wasn't illegally imprisoned without access to legal representation and sent to a foreign nation for detainment?


Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
 
Last edited:

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,452
Location
White Oak Plantation
Should he be grateful he wasn't illegally imprisoned without access to legal representation and sent to a foreign nation for detainment?


Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Well, knowing what I know about the Patriot Act and the last round of the NDAA, from folks on this forum by the way, he is darn lucky.

I'm all for this nitwit saying his piece and getting off for it, by a jury of his peers no less.
 

eye95

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
13,524
Location
Fairborn, Ohio, USA
Sounds to me like things pretty well happened like they should. He did threaten public officials. He did put the disclaimer on there that the threat should be carried out if they did not act within the Constitution. In the matter of his concern, it turns out that they long since had. The threat was not carried out.

There was, IMO, probable cause to hold him to account. He was so held. The jury thought there was no there there and acquitted him. IMO, they were right. His lawsuit will be an annoyance, but will surely lose. In this civil suit, "the man" will beat the rap, but won't beat the ride (nice turnaround).

This guy seems to make a habit of threatening public officials and has been convicted at least once, so that part of the system seems to be working.

I don't see a problem. I feel inclined to steal that famous LEO phrase: Nothing to see here folks. Move along.
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
Sounds to me like things pretty well happened like they should. He did threaten public officials. He did put the disclaimer on there that the threat should be carried out if they did not act within the Constitution. In the matter of his concern, it turns out that they long since had. The threat was not carried out.

There was, IMO, probable cause to hold him to account. He was so held. The jury thought there was no there there and acquitted him. IMO, they were right. His lawsuit will be an annoyance, but will surely lose. In this civil suit, "the man" will beat the rap, but won't beat the ride (nice turnaround).

This guy seems to make a habit of threatening public officials and has been convicted at least once, so that part of the system seems to be working.

I don't see a problem. I feel inclined to steal that famous LEO phrase: Nothing to see here folks. Move along.

Politicians are like weeds .. pull one out and two more will take its place....its the reason why I don't cry for politicians to be buried under 18" of dirt. Not that I would find anyone guilty if on a jury ... live in fear politicians is my motto !
 
Top