Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Chicago wants to ignore ruling in moore v madigan

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838

    Chicago wants to ignore ruling in moore v madigan

    "I believe that the city would be well within its rights to prohibit that (concealed weapons) within its borders, and then we'll take that up to the Supreme Court," said Alderman Joe Moore.


    http://news.yahoo.com/chicago-vows-f...080408481.html


    As I have repeated said : democrats = fascists

    They have become who they abhor ...

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    northern wis
    Posts
    3,193
    That is a lot like saying we are in are rights to allow others because of race,religion, sexual perferance and others to discriminated against.
    Personal Defensive Solutions professional personal firearms, edge weapons and hands on defensive training and tactics pdsolutions@hotmail.com

    Any and all spelling errors are just to give the spelling Nazis something to do

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Southern Illinois, Illinois, USA
    Posts
    364
    Quote Originally Posted by davidmcbeth View Post
    "I believe that the city would be well within its rights to prohibit that (concealed weapons) within its borders, and then we'll take that up to the Supreme Court," said Alderman Joe Moore.


    http://news.yahoo.com/chicago-vows-f...080408481.html


    As I have repeated said : democrats = fascists

    They have become who they abhor ...
    You would think Chicago would learn. Their handgun ban cost them millions of dollars in attorney fees paid to those who won the McDonald Vs. Chicago case in the Supreme Court. I guess they want to be slapped down again. Support is growing for license to carry among inner city blacks who are getting tired of being victims of gang violence. They'd like to be protected by guns just like Rahm is!

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South end of the state, Illinois, USA
    Posts
    314
    Quote Originally Posted by JTHunter View Post
    I got an email tonight from Illinois Gun Rights stating that they are trying to push a "Chicago-style" ban through the legislature during this lame duck session. They felt that the vote could come as early as Wed., 1/2/13, (tomorrow!) and would basically try to make guns as available in the rest of the state as they are in Chicago.
    Needless to say, they urged us to call our reps and senators in Springfield.
    This goes farther than that though. They are including pump action rifles also. I think we made them mad by winning the Moore/Shepherd case.

  5. #5
    Regular Member hammer6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,169
    Quote Originally Posted by JTHunter View Post
    I got an email tonight from Illinois Gun Rights stating that they are trying to push a "Chicago-style" ban through the legislature during this lame duck session. They felt that the vote could come as early as Wed., 1/2/13, (tomorrow!) and would basically try to make guns as available in the rest of the state as they are in Chicago.
    Needless to say, they urged us to call our reps and senators in Springfield.
    let them do it....then when it goes to the SCOTUS, it'll be struck down, and then they will lose hope for a national gun ban. illinois already sucks, so it's not like they are losing out on anything...so let them pass this bill....

  6. #6
    Regular Member acmariner99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Renton, Wa
    Posts
    662
    Quote Originally Posted by hammer6 View Post
    let them do it....then when it goes to the SCOTUS, it'll be struck down, and then they will lose hope for a national gun ban. illinois already sucks, so it's not like they are losing out on anything...so let them pass this bill....
    The only caveat is that it needs to get to the SCOTUS before the two elderly conservative judges retire. If they do while we are in our current state, we can say goodbye to the 2A.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •