self preservation
Regular Member
We all know by heart when we can and can not use deadly force, but how about plain physical force? My question comes from a conversation with a lady tonight that said that she was told that if she was at Wal-Mart and someone came up to her and punched her in the face, she could only call the police but not fight back. I told her that didn't sound right and that I would find her a KRS to prove otherwise. I have been reading through chapter 503 but most mentions of physical force are for "imminent death, serious physical injury, kidnapping, sexual intercourse compelled by force or threat, or other felony involving the use of force"
I did find under KRS 503.050, "The use of physical force by a defendant upon another person is justifiable when the defendant believes that such force is necessary to protect himself against the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force by the other person". I'm not sure what KRS would apply to just a good old fashion punch to the face. Plus KRS 503.050 is "Use of physical force in self-protection -- Admissibility of evidence of prior acts of domestic violence and abuse". Would that apply to simple assault because it wouldn't be an act of domestic violence? What KRS say's that we can fight back?
I did find under KRS 503.050, "The use of physical force by a defendant upon another person is justifiable when the defendant believes that such force is necessary to protect himself against the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force by the other person". I'm not sure what KRS would apply to just a good old fashion punch to the face. Plus KRS 503.050 is "Use of physical force in self-protection -- Admissibility of evidence of prior acts of domestic violence and abuse". Would that apply to simple assault because it wouldn't be an act of domestic violence? What KRS say's that we can fight back?