eye95
Well-known member
Armed guards?
That idea denies the foundation of the 2A: the armed CITIZEN.
Armed guards are one step, but a more effective one would be armed teachers. Yes, in an environment where there are immature (and some delinquent) juveniles, I can understand why there would need to be additional training required before a teacher or staff member would be allowed to carry. But every teacher--who has been trained and follows proper procedures to ensure that his firearm does not fall into the hands of the children, while maintaining ready accessibility to it--should be allowed, and even encouraged, to carry.
That is the best (really the only) way to protect the children. I am disappoint in (but not surprised by) the NRA and its lame solution.
That idea denies the foundation of the 2A: the armed CITIZEN.
Armed guards are one step, but a more effective one would be armed teachers. Yes, in an environment where there are immature (and some delinquent) juveniles, I can understand why there would need to be additional training required before a teacher or staff member would be allowed to carry. But every teacher--who has been trained and follows proper procedures to ensure that his firearm does not fall into the hands of the children, while maintaining ready accessibility to it--should be allowed, and even encouraged, to carry.
That is the best (really the only) way to protect the children. I am disappoint in (but not surprised by) the NRA and its lame solution.