Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Larry Pratt STOMPS Pier Morgan With the TRUTH

  1. #1
    Activist Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ashland, KY
    Posts
    1,847

    Larry Pratt STOMPS Piers Morgan With the TRUTH

    Excellent video of Executive Director Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America debating Piers Morgan.

    It gets very interesting right after the five minute mark. Larry Pratt effectively shuts Morgan up and he returns to his name calling to try and draw attention away from the TRUTH!

    I must commend Mr. Pratt -- and I thank him for standing up for ALL gun owners. Much better arguments than Lapierre.

    Please watch!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FVQgLkbLjQ
    Last edited by KYGlockster; 12-23-2012 at 09:15 PM.
    "I never in my life seen a Kentuckian without a gun..."-Andrew Jackson

    "Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined."-Patrick Henry; speaking of protecting the rights of an armed citizenry.

  2. #2
    Regular Member Redbaron007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    SW MO
    Posts
    1,637
    Pratt did a good job defending himself.

    As to whether he did a better job than LaPierre yesterday, is a comparison of apples and oranges.

    I think they both did a good job for their venues.
    "I can live for two weeks on a good compliment."
    ~Mark Twain

  3. #3
    Regular Member J1MB0B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Tacoma, Washington
    Posts
    239
    Some of the comments on the video are pretty good

  4. #4
    Regular Member motoxmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Middletown, CT
    Posts
    763
    wow, I never knew Morgan was such an ignorant twit. he is a perfect example of the type of person we as a country forced out of our country in order to create our country in the first place, and it's obvious why.

    The 2nd amendement is HOW our country was founded. and it is very clear to me now WHY our country was founded. so thank you Morgan for that overly convincing reminder
    Last edited by motoxmann; 12-23-2012 at 01:47 PM.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    300
    Morgan kept lying about the AR being used at the school and Pratt didn't call him on it once. The rifle never left Lanza's car. Why would Pratt keep letting Morgan get away with spewing such BS?

  6. #6
    Founder's Club Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Fairfax Co., VA
    Posts
    18,766
    Quote Originally Posted by Ca Patriot View Post
    I have noticed many times in watching Piers Morgan that he constantly talks about how much better Europe is and how bad America is but.......he lives in America.

    We should seriously deport his ass back to his british utopia.
    Can't. England is Anglican. Heny VIII lopped off the head of the staunch Catholic who created Utopia--Thomas More.
    I'll make you an offer: I will argue and fight for all of your rights, if you will do the same for me. That is the only way freedom can work. We have to respect all rights, all the time--and strive to win the rights of the other guy as much as for ourselves.

    If I am equal to another, how can I legitimately govern him without his express individual consent?

    There is no human being on earth I hate so much I would actually vote to inflict government upon him.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Cary, North Carolina, United States
    Posts
    138
    Quote Originally Posted by mustangkiller View Post
    Morgan kept lying about the AR being used at the school and Pratt didn't call him on it once. The rifle never left Lanza's car. Why would Pratt keep letting Morgan get away with spewing such BS?
    Cite please. I've heard so many conflicting reports. I've heard the rifle was found in the car but have also heard the the medical examine said that the majority of the wounds were inflicted with a rifle and I have heard that it was a shotgun that was found in the car.

  8. #8
    Regular Member motoxmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Middletown, CT
    Posts
    763
    Nobody knows for sure, as the town and state have not released a single document on anything with any facts whatsoever, even after repeated foi requests from citizens and news stations.

    The first day it was always reports saying he used handguns, and that a rifle was found in the car. It wasnt until over 24 hours after it happened (once the president and other politicians stepped in) that they changed the story to saying a bushmaster AR!% type rifle was used and the handguns were not
    Last edited by motoxmann; 12-24-2012 at 12:09 AM.

  9. #9
    Activist Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ashland, KY
    Posts
    1,847
    I don't believe there was an AR anywhere in sight! If he had an AR in his vehicle and was intending on killing numerous people, what is the logical weapon to use? A rifle or handguns? We ALL know the answer to that question! I don't trust the Federal Government at ALL, and I believe this is a fabrication to get people chanting for another AWB!

    Here is a good video of what happens when we allow them to take our firearms! We MUST NEVER allow them to take our firearms or prohibit us from purchasing firearms that are already owned by MILLIONS!

    Australia gun ban and rise in crime: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyS3CEIbpJo

    UK gun ban and rise in crime: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGVAQOUi6ec

    This information is not hard to verify, so why can't the anti-gunners do so? Because they don't want to hear the truth!
    Last edited by KYGlockster; 12-23-2012 at 09:19 PM.
    "I never in my life seen a Kentuckian without a gun..."-Andrew Jackson

    "Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined."-Patrick Henry; speaking of protecting the rights of an armed citizenry.

  10. #10
    Regular Member motoxmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Middletown, CT
    Posts
    763
    I edited my above post, my wording was wrong. in the first 24+ hours they never stated what brand or type of rifle was found in the car, they simply said he used 2 handguns, and a rifle was found in the car he drove to the school.

  11. #11
    Regular Member motoxmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Middletown, CT
    Posts
    763
    Quote Originally Posted by Ca Patriot View Post
    I dont understand why the police wont release what guns were found at the scene.

    Just typical government hiding information that doesnt belong to them.
    personally, I believe it's because the government has written their own version of the story, one that is completely different than the truth, all just to try and gain support for their plan to completely disarm all US citizens

    btw, as far as I know, press conferences DO NOT need to state 100% accurate information. the only information that is typically most accurate is the actual document records with the town, which still have yet to be released to anyone

  12. #12
    Regular Member TNTTNT187's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    15
    I like how Mr. Pratt would not get off message about this being about defending yourself. I would like to see the question asked of Mr. Morgan if he employs armed body guards to protect him.

    Also, I would think with as many LEO's and different investigators involved on scene as well as the medical examiner at the shooting, it would be hard to contain that the rifle was used when it was not. I'm not saying The Fed. couldn't pull it off, just tricky to make the smoki'n gun appear and not disappear.

  13. #13
    Regular Member motoxmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Middletown, CT
    Posts
    763
    Quote Originally Posted by TNTTNT187 View Post
    Also, I would think with as many LEO's and different investigators involved on scene as well as the medical examiner at the shooting, it would be hard to contain that the rifle was used when it was not. I'm not saying The Fed. couldn't pull it off, just tricky to make the smoki'n gun appear and not disappear.
    thats just the thing. the many stories on the day it happened saying handguns were used and a rifle was found in the car all came from first responders requesting to be anonymous due to not being authorized. saying the rifle was used didn't occur until 24+ hours later; after government stepped in

  14. #14
    Activist Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ashland, KY
    Posts
    1,847
    The Federal Government LIES! The government has been lying to us for over 100 years, and we shouldn't believe anything they say! The government will do whatever is needed to get their agenda passed into law and to oppress the People!

    I find it disheartening that all of these ARs, AKs and STANDARD capacity magazines are flying off of the shelves! People, they are buying them because they are "afraid" the government is going to ban them! If they are buying them up before the government does so, then they are probably not going to fight the ban when it comes our way!

    If we allow them to ban ANYTHING then we are losing. They will NOT stop with ten round magazines and "assault" weapons! Just research what has happened in Australia, the UK and other countries that have "slowly" disarmed their citizens!

    Now it's no magazine above ten rounds, next it will be NO weapons that take removable magazines and no possession of ANY non-fixed magazine.

    After this it will be only revolvers, and nothing that holds ammunition in ANY type of magazine.

    Then it will be NO revolvers and ONLY single-shot firearms.

    Then it will be NO firearms!

    If we allow them to take a little now (actually a lot), then we WILL lose EVERYTHING later. It will not take long either after this, maybe twenty years or so!

    Sure buy the firearms if you want them, but do NOT allow them to BAN them from us! Do NOT allow them to BAN possession or purchase of magazines that are more than ten rounds!

    If we allow them to ban anything, then our Second Amendment right is history! Nearly every firearm and accessory is shipped in interstate commerce, so nearly EVERY item will be restricted by the Federal Government. Even if our states nullify this legislation for their citizens and items manufactured in that state, we are still SCREWED!

    WE CANNOT ALLOW THEM TO BAN ANY FIREARM OR ACCESSORY! IF WE DO THIS WE ARE KILLING OUR SECOND AMENDMENT! WE WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DENYING OUR FUTURE GENERATIONS THEIR RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS AND BEAR THE ARMS THEY WANT!

    THIS IS REAL PEOPLE -- IT ISN'T A GAME! THIS IS OUR LIFE, OUR FREEDOM AND OUR FUTURE! PLEASE FIGHT FOR IT!
    Last edited by KYGlockster; 12-24-2012 at 07:48 PM.
    "I never in my life seen a Kentuckian without a gun..."-Andrew Jackson

    "Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined."-Patrick Henry; speaking of protecting the rights of an armed citizenry.

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Fairfax VA
    Posts
    52
    Larry Pratt is right in that Piers Morgan is Morally Obtuse.

    I would have responded earlier, but when I heard those words come out of his mouth, I literally spewed soda all over my keyboard.

    May my old keyboard R.I.P. It has become the latest martyr in the pro-2nd Amendment cause.

    Anyhow, enough of my drivel. I'm off to the Dulles Expo Center for the gun show today. Perhaps I'll call all the ladies protesting the show "Morally Obtuse".

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •