TheQ
Regular Member
Another thread derailment by stainless...err, boiled frogs. I'm starting to think someone's ignore suggestion would be a good one.
Just read the article. It was a revolver. How in the world do you have an ND unloading a revolver?
Mmmm... finger on the trigger when it shouldn't be, finger on the trigger before swinging the cylinder out?griffin said:How in the world do you have an ND unloading a revolver?
+1 !!!! I wish legislators would understand this.Evil Creamsicle said:More handling means more opportunity for an accident.
Just read the article. It was a revolver. How in the world do you have an ND unloading a revolver?
Another Fuddapalooza makes the news. Why do people go to gun shows that don't allow lawful carry? No wonder the antis are eating our lunch....:banghead:
Actually, it's a matter of time before it happens to you too. It's an odds thing, handle a gun long enough, often enough, and sooner or later, you will have an accident with one. You won't agree, prolly come back with a canned response of some sort, but thats ok. Fact is, people are imperfect, we make mistakes, and given enough time, it has to happen.
Another thread derailment by stainless...err, boiled frogs. I'm starting to think someone's ignore suggestion would be a good one.
So now we need to bash Boiled Frogs anytime he posts? If he is stainless1911 and it is a sure thing then ban him, otherwise give him the benefit of the doubt, someone could check his IP. I know, I know, I am wasting my time.
Maybe the article is just plain wrong about reporting a revolver.
Is it safer to assume that it can happen to you, or that it can not happen to you.
It's safer to always follow safe fire arms handling techniques.
The argument isn't silly, it's just math.
No, it's speculation with no provided facts to support it. Please cite your resources to substantiate your assertion that a ND is unavoidable to all firearms owners.
ETA. If stainless said it, it must be wrong, right?
Correct
Im not misinformed. Laws (and in this case, ) policies that require or force law abiding citizens to handle their weapons which would otherwise be holstered, will inevitably lead to such happenings.
So now we need to bash Boiled Frogs anytime he posts? If he is stainless1911 and it is a sure thing then ban him, otherwise give him the benefit of the doubt, someone could check his IP. I know, I know, I am wasting my time.
IP was different. Maybe he's using an anonomyzer, maybe he reset his router, maybe he posts from a friends house.
As sure as the sun rose today, it's stainless.
One liners
Inappropriate comments
Certain cliches used (guilty until proven innocent)
Late late night posting
Timing and circumstances under which account was originally opened and used.
Forgot: LEO Hating, CC Hating
You forgot inappropriate behaviour with pre adolescent children and letting them 'surf' on his car.
That was stainles1911. Boiled Frogs has never done such a thing!
anyone who patronizes a Fuddapalooza deserves to shoot themselves
That's a bit inappropriate, don't you think?