Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Sen- Feinstein

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Cudahy, Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    326

    Sen- Feinstein


  2. #2
    Regular Member XDFDE45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    823
    That woman is the BIGGEST hypocrite on the planet and the fact that ANYONE takes her seriously is a sign of how ignorant they are .
    Wisconsin Carry Member
    My Castle Doctrine Law

    Don't wish ill upon your enemy......plan it.

  3. #3
    Regular Member ArcticF7SnoPro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Plover, WI,
    Posts
    29
    The only light at the end of the tunnel for us is that if she plans on going so radical off the bat it is less likely to gain as much support through out. She would have been better off bleeding it slow. In my opinion you don't put your foot in the door by blowing it off the hinges.

  4. #4
    Founder's Club Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Fairfax Co., VA
    Posts
    18,766
    Quote Originally Posted by ArcticF7SnoPro View Post
    The only light at the end of the tunnel for us is that if she plans on going so radical off the bat it is less likely to gain as much support through out. She would have been better off bleeding it slow. In my opinion you don't put your foot in the door by blowing it off the hinges.
    My money says shes using a negotiating tactic. Make huge demands, but "compromise" by settling for less.

    Remember, she loses nothing even if the entire bill and every line item is rejected. Its no skin off her nose. Plus, she gets points with her constituents just by submitting the bill.

    The negotiation would happen in committee where multiple bills would be integrated and/or a committee that hashes out differences between house and senate versions.

    Its a lose-lose situation for us because any compromise results in loss of freedom.



    I think our biggest mistake was to rest somewhat these last several years. About all we pushed generally was shall-issue and pre-emption. I think we needed to be pushing for expansion of gun rights at the federal level. Chiseling away at the 1968 GCA. If we had kept freedom as an issue and kept pushing for more and more we might have more supporters today. Virginia Citizens Defense League has the right idea. Keep pushing on multiple fronts while growing numbers. Too bad the NRA wasn't playing that game on the national level.
    I'll make you an offer: I will argue and fight for all of your rights, if you will do the same for me. That is the only way freedom can work. We have to respect all rights, all the time--and strive to win the rights of the other guy as much as for ourselves.

    If I am equal to another, how can I legitimately govern him without his express individual consent?

    There is no human being on earth I hate so much I would actually vote to inflict government upon him.

  5. #5
    Regular Member littlewolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    A, A
    Posts
    349
    The only 'MILITARY CHARICTORISTIC ' Sould have to be 'Property of US GOVERNMENT '. but IMHO all weapons restrictions on type of weaponare unconstitutional !
    Owner Little Wolf Firearms , US ARMY RETIRED 101st Airborne & 84th DIV TRNG Small arms instructor.
    Remember , Gun Control is " USING BOTH HANDS!"

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Northwoods, lakeland area, Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    2,170
    The only compromise she is going to get from me is how deep the permanent mushroom print in the middle of her forehead is going to be!!!

  7. #7
    Regular Member Lurchiron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Shawano,WI.
    Posts
    1,011
    Quote Originally Posted by Nutczak View Post
    The only compromise she is going to get from me is how deep the permanent mushroom print in the middle of her forehead is going to be!!!
    Portabella or Shitake ???

    Attachment 9769
    Bale da Hay

    "Have you Spanked a leftist today; it's the Right thing to do!!!"


    Within the gates before a man shall go,
    (Fully warily let him watch,)
    Full long let him look about him;
    For little he knows where a foe may lurk,
    And sit in the seats within.

    Havamal (Bellows translation)

  8. #8
    Regular Member anmut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Stevens Point WI, ,
    Posts
    879
    Quote Originally Posted by Citizen View Post
    My money says shes using a negotiating tactic. Make huge demands, but "compromise" by settling for less.

    Remember, she loses nothing even if the entire bill and every line item is rejected. Its no skin off her nose. Plus, she gets points with her constituents just by submitting the bill.

    The negotiation would happen in committee where multiple bills would be integrated and/or a committee that hashes out differences between house and senate versions.

    Its a lose-lose situation for us because any compromise results in loss of freedom.



    I think our biggest mistake was to rest somewhat these last several years. About all we pushed generally was shall-issue and pre-emption. I think we needed to be pushing for expansion of gun rights at the federal level. Chiseling away at the 1968 GCA. If we had kept freedom as an issue and kept pushing for more and more we might have more supporters today. Virginia Citizens Defense League has the right idea. Keep pushing on multiple fronts while growing numbers. Too bad the NRA wasn't playing that game on the national level.
    You got it - classic lawyer move. Demand it all, receive 50%, which is what she expected in the first place.

    However I suggest she get nothing and can go pound sand up a river.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •