Yes. By wasting votes, or not voting, they gave us the candidates who least supported Liberty.
I believe that that was many of their secret intent. By crashing Liberty totally, they hope to awaken some kind of revolution that will restore Liberty. But that is folly. Almost all revolutions in history resulted in less Liberty, not more. The American Revolution was an anomaly. However, it was not so much a revolution as a throwing off of outside usurpers.
No, our last best hope for Liberty died with the reelection of Obama with a solid Senate behind him. I do believe the ultimate result will be a revolution. Successful or not, it will increase oppression, not Liberty.
Again, thanks a lot.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.
<o>
I suppose if one
really needs to blame even the smallest fraction of other "losers" in the last political contest to feel better about wasting their own vote on a different (2nd place) loser, I won't waste my breath ridiculing that need any further than this post.
It is a small consolation to me that others in this thread have at least acknowledge having learned a lesson from their vote and hopefully gained a fresh perspective on the current system and how easily it steers most of the population to fall in line with false promises and clever rhetoric (from
both sides of the same coin.)
My hopes for Liberty did not die with the last election, only my hopes of a political solution. Revolution
is required... in the hearts and minds of Americans.
Wars and battles generally only accompany revolutions of spirit and thought when force is initiated to quash them, most typically by those who sense their monopoly of power and control being challenged by "dangerous" or "revolutionary" sentiment and thinking.
I'll pass on the prospects of conflict or war, if they may be avoided, but Revolution? Yes, please, the sooner the better.