Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: for those who thought the gov wasn't going to attempt to completely disarm us...

  1. #1
    Regular Member motoxmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Middletown, CT
    Posts
    763

    for those who thought the gov wasn't going to attempt to completely disarm us...

    this is a bill that was proposed in CT.

    link to the thread on it in the CT section: http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/sh...ons-on-gun-use

    Quote Originally Posted by romma View Post
    http://www.cga.ct.gov/2013/TOB/S/201...122-R00-SB.htm

    Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY


    Introduced by:


    SEN. MEYER, 12th Dist.


    AN ACT CONCERNING RESTRICTIONS ON GUN USE.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:

    That the general statutes be amended to establish a class C felony offense, except for certain military and law enforcement personnel and certain gun clubs, for (1) any person or organization to purchase, sell, donate, transport, possess or use any gun except one made to fire a single round, (2) any person to fire a gun containing more than a single round, (3) any person or organization to receive from another state, territory or country a gun made to fire multiple rounds, or (4) any person or organization to purchase, sell, donate or possess a magazine or clip capable of holding more than one round.

    Statement of Purpose:

    To reduce the use of guns for criminal purposes.
    I can't even say how many times I've read it now, and I still can't believe my eyes. this is beyond anything I ever imagined

  2. #2
    Regular Member KYKevin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Owensboro, Kentucky, USA
    Posts
    328
    I don't think this is meant to pass. They will probably introduce several like this to make the AWB bill that finstein wants to pass look more attractive. Giving it a better chance to pass.
    Kentucky Open Carry Group
    http://opencarry.niceboards.org/

    We all speak of liberty and freedom like we are the only ones that know the truth and the right path. But if we expect everyone to accept and follow our path and to accept our truth and want to force it upon them then that is no longer liberty or freedom. It is slavery. I believe in liberty for all. Regardless of their political views, religion, race, sex, etc.

  3. #3
    Regular Member pfries's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    East Tennessee
    Posts
    182
    Quote Originally Posted by motoxmann View Post
    this is a bill that was proposed in CT.

    link to the thread on it in the CT section: http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/sh...ons-on-gun-use



    I can't even say how many times I've read it now, and I still can't believe my eyes. this is beyond anything I ever imagined
    Great so now they are pushing for disposable guns.... criminals will love that.

    Seriously though it upsets me to even see something like this introduced, anywhere.

  4. #4
    Regular Member OC for ME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    White Oak Plantation
    Posts
    12,270
    I think that a compromise will be found somewhere between 1 and 30 rounds......10 rounds sounds like a good number.
    "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson.

    "Better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer" - English jurist William Blackstone.
    It is AFAIK original to me. Compromise is failure on the installment plan, particularly when dealing with so intractable an opponent as ignorance. - Nightmare

  5. #5
    Regular Member motoxmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Middletown, CT
    Posts
    763
    Quote Originally Posted by OC for ME View Post
    I think that a compromise will be found somewhere between 1 and 30 rounds......10 rounds sounds like a good number.
    sounds like a great number; for someone who wishes to die for a cause

    (notice I used the word "wishes", NOT "willing")

  6. #6
    Campaign Veteran MSG Laigaie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Philipsburg, Montana
    Posts
    3,135
    If I can only have ten rounds, can I wear two weapons?
    "Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the people's liberty teeth (and) keystone... the rifle and the pistol are equally indispensable... more than 99% of them by their silence indicate that they are in safe and sane hands. The very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference .When firearms go, all goes, we need them every hour." -- George Washington

  7. #7
    Regular Member hermannr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Okanogan Highland
    Posts
    2,332
    Quote Originally Posted by MSG Laigaie View Post
    If I can only have ten rounds, can I wear two weapons?
    You can already carry 2 weapons, or 3...a couple BUG's are always nice to have.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    Those in Hartford do know that the atomic bomb is technology that is 60+ years old right? They going to pass a law saying no one can build a functioning one? They are not hard to make-I saw a kid make one on youtube. And what they going to do when one goes off, give the guy a ticket?

    Also, that's one round, right? Seems to conform to the proposed law .. as long as its shot out of a barrel (no problem-o).




    God, they are idiots ...

    Actually, I would treat this as a serious piece of legislation. Clearly the democratic leadership supports it or it would not have been received.

    We should welcome this bill and support it ! Just to have the courts strike it down.

    The more democrats who vote/sign this bill the better !

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •