No AR-15 Used to kill kids!!!

If you haven't heard the story. Well here it is.... :banana::monkey

What is Obama, Biden, and Feinstein going to say now.... LOL

So they finally had to come out and admit it, now that the Coroner has released some info along with police.

An AR-15, or the so-called "Assault Weapon", was not used in the school shooting. The shooter even tried weeks earlier to buy a rifle but was turned down in the background check. So he had to kill his Mother to steal her rifle. There were initial reports, right after the shooting, that police found the AR-15 in his car, NOT IN THE SCHOOL. The rifle was not used. The shooter went into the school with 4 handguns, NOT an Assault Rifle as the media has charged. I remember in the initial hours of this shooting, the Police said they found the rifle in the car. But the Administration-controlled MSM had a pre-planned attack already waiting, to ban so-called assault weapons and jumped on that line of reporting, knowing it was a lie, which included people like Piers Morgan who said the shooter used an AR-15 that shoots hundreds of rounds per minute, as if it were a machine gun. Could it be that the Democrat Liberals and THEIR MEDIA were pushing for the new law, hoping they could do it, before the Coroner released the info? Absolutely.

CLICK AND WATCH THE LINK FROM MSNBC...

http://video.today.msnbc.msn.com/today/50208495#50208495

aired date was Dec.15 anything newer?


Mike

I haven't seen anything new. I found this and thought I would post it in case others hadn't seen it.

The ghost of Ronald Reagan obviously came back and killed those kids with a phased plasma carbine while Abe Lincoln covered his six with a M41 pulse rifle.

Devin Hutchison said:

Stay away from Kentucky Guns. I heard the owner was a kook.


Nothing newer, I'm working on finding any newer reports. It just got to me.

Click to expand...

"I heard the owner was a kook." What??? LMAO... :lol::shocker:

It's now beginning to break on most media outlets. Even CNN now is reporting that no assault weapon was used in the shootings. I just did a Google search for, "no ar-15 in massacre", and got many hits some only a few hours old.

The OP was incorrect, the shooter was not "blocked" on the firearm sale. he was legally allowed to own a gun. nothing in law blocked him. the background check didn't "block him" the store decided to terminate the sale because Lanza was griping about the waiting period.

http://articles.latimes.com/2012/de...nman-tried-to-buy-rifile-days-before-20121215

tried to purchase a "long gun" rifle from a local shop but was turned away because he did not want to wait for the required 14-day background check, law enforcement sources said Saturday.

Click to expand...

@ Sun diver, google isn't showing those recent hits, can you please link an article to cite your position?

Sundiver said:

It's now beginning to break on most media outlets. Even CNN now is reporting that no assault weapon was used in the shootings. I just did a Google search for, "no ar-15 in massacre", and got many hits some only a few hours old.

Click to expand...

Linky? thx

It's getting really old, people continuing to post that MSNBC video from early the next morning, as if it's some late-breaking investigative report.

Here's the report from the Connecticut State Police:

http://www.ct.gov/despp/cwp/view.asp?Q=517284&A=4226

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 18, 2013


** UPDATE **

STATE POLICE IDENTIFY WEAPONS USED IN SANDY HOOK INVESTIGATION;
INVESTIGATION CONTINUES

In previous press conferences, the Connecticut State Police clearly identified all of the weapons seized from the crime scene at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

To eliminate any confusion or misinformation, we will again describe and identify the weapons seized at the school crime scene.



Seized inside the school:

#1. Bushmaster .223 caliber-- model XM15-E2S rifle with high capacity 30 round magazine



#2. Glock 10 mm handgun



#3. Sig-Sauer P226 9mm handgun



Seized from suspect’s car in parking lot:


#4. Izhmash Canta-12 12 gauge Shotgun (seized from car in parking lot)



This case remains under investigation.

Lt. J. Paul Vance

KBCraig said:

It's getting really old, people continuing to post that MSNBC video from early the next morning, as if it's some late-breaking investigative report.

Here's the report from the Connecticut State Police:

http://www.ct.gov/despp/cwp/view.asp?Q=517284&A=4226

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 18, 2013


** UPDATE **

STATE POLICE IDENTIFY WEAPONS USED IN SANDY HOOK INVESTIGATION;
INVESTIGATION CONTINUES

In previous press conferences, the Connecticut State Police clearly identified all of the weapons seized from the crime scene at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

To eliminate any confusion or misinformation, we will again describe and identify the weapons seized at the school crime scene.



Seized inside the school:

#1. Bushmaster .223 caliber-- model XM15-E2S rifle with high capacity 30 round magazine



#2. Glock 10 mm handgun



#3. Sig-Sauer P226 9mm handgun



Seized from suspect’s car in parking lot:


#4. Izhmash Canta-12 12 gauge Shotgun (seized from car in parking lot)



This case remains under investigation.

Lt. J. Paul Vance

Click to expand...

I have some prime swampland for sale, along with some very mildly used bridges if you are interested.

WalkingWolf said:

I have some prime swampland for sale, along with some very mildly used bridges if you are interested.

Click to expand...

Please don't mistake me for someone who accepts at face value any government report.

On the other hand, anyone watching that video who still thinks "the AR was in the trunk" either knows nothing about firearms, or is delusional.

I'm troubled that pro-gun folks point to this disjointed MSNBC report (seriously? MSNBC?) where the anchors were being fed constantly changing information, live on the air, about a subject they know nothing about, and it's accepted as gospel proof that no AR was used inside the school.

There are many legitimate questions about this incident. Questions about whether an AR was used inside the school can only be answered by full disclosure of the wounds suffered, and brass found inside the school.

This MSNBC report isn't proof of anything, except that many who are skeptical of government forget to be equally skeptical of reports that appear to favor their prejudices.

Skepticism is healthy, but it's not true skepticism unless you're skeptical of everything.

I have filed a foia request for records, got denied, filed an appeal under Sec. 1-206 of CGS .. and this is past 30 days old ... and per 1-206 a hearing must be heard w/i 30 days by the FIC ... the gov't does not want to release records ... I have contacted the FIC seeking an immediate hearing ... no response...

And how can they know when an investigation is going to end (they say in the summer - past this leg. session -- how convenient) if it is an actual investigation?

KBCraig said:

Please don't mistake me for someone who accepts at face value any government report.

On the other hand, anyone watching that video who still thinks "the AR was in the trunk" either knows nothing about firearms, or is delusional.

I'm troubled that pro-gun folks point to this disjointed MSNBC report (seriously? MSNBC?) where the anchors were being fed constantly changing information, live on the air, about a subject they know nothing about, and it's accepted as gospel proof that no AR was used inside the school.

There are many legitimate questions about this incident. Questions about whether an AR was used inside the school can only be answered by full disclosure of the wounds suffered, and brass found inside the school.

This MSNBC report isn't proof of anything, except that many who are skeptical of government forget to be equally skeptical of reports that appear to favor their prejudices.

Skepticism is healthy, but it's not true skepticism unless you're skeptical of everything.

Click to expand...

The shotgun was removed from that trunk. Did you happen to notice the time of day that it was supposedly discovered in the trunk? I can't believe this has slipped by so many people. There is no reason in the world other than to bolster a lie to put the shotgun back in the trunk AFTER they already discovered it during daylight hours, so they could video removing it in the dark.

ALL the media reports reported handguns, they ALL said that it came from the police or feds. Not at anyone time was it claimed unconfirmed. Somebody is lying!

EMNofSeattle said:

The OP was incorrect, the shooter was not "blocked" on the firearm sale. he was legally allowed to own a gun. nothing in law blocked him. the background check didn't "block him" the store decided to terminate the sale because Lanza was griping about the waiting period.

http://articles.latimes.com/2012/de...nman-tried-to-buy-rifile-days-before-20121215



@ Sun diver, google isn't showing those recent hits, can you please link an article to cite your position?

Click to expand...

WHAT? You mean the almighty 14 day waiting period that the liberals love and praise didn't stop this insidious fool from committing murder? This MUST be incorrect because by the way so many talk this law would've surely stopped the carnage committed by an EVIL killer.