Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Hearing yields explosive testimony about law enforcement corruption in gun case

  1. #1
    Centurion
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Yuma, Arizona, USA
    Posts
    923

    Hearing yields explosive testimony about law enforcement corruption in gun case

    A decision on whether or not members of a New Mexico gun dealer family will get a new trial on charges of lying on federal firearm purchase forms could happen as early as this week, Las Cruces Sun-News reported yesterday. Judge Robert C. Brack of the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico indicated in yesterday’s hearing that he will make his decision “soon” following a day of testimony that revealed the extent of corruption a key law enforcement witness against the Reese family was under investigation for – a fact the prosecution withheld from the defense and the jury when it was asked to decide whose testimony during the trial was credible.

    Defendants Rick and Terri Reese and son Ryin, New Mexico gun dealers jailed for allegedly knowingly selling guns to cartel members, and who have since had conspiracy and money laundering charges against them dismissed, filed a motion for a new trial after being convicted of, as Jeff Knox of the Firearms Coalition described it, “the comparatively minor charge of lying on gun sales forms -- even though the lies they were convicted of were perpetrated by federal agents and the Reese's crimes were that they ‘should have known’ that the agents were lying.” A second son, Remington Reese, was cleared of all charges.

    “Attorneys for the Reeses … argued Monday that their clients deserve a new trial because the U.S. Attorney’s Office did not provide the defense with potentially damaging information about a key prosecution witness until after the trial ended,” ABQ Journal reported earlier this morning. “Defense attorneys contend the witness, Luna County sheriff’s detective Allen Batts, might have shaded his testimony to curry favor with federal prosecutors, since he has been the subject of federal investigation for the past decade.”

    This was “critical to prosecutors” because it was his word against that of Terri Reese that the jury evidently sided with over the question of whether “she knew one of the weapons sold had ended up in Mexico.”

    The extent of the alleged official corruption might also explain why the prosecution was so anxious to violate established Department of Justice policy when it asked to have yesterday’s hearing sealed from the public, a motion denied by Judge Brack. And those allegations are nothing short of stunning, as Tea Party Patriots of Luna County have documented in an exhaustive five-part detailing of yesterday’s proceedings, information now made public that would not have been possible had the government prevailed, and even now only available because passionately interested chroniclers other than "Authorized Journalists" were there to record and report it.

    In Part One, the TPP documents how allegations of drug smuggling, ripping off drug dealers, human trafficking and other crimes by the witness (and others) were being investigated, and that this was withheld from the defense and the jury, in violation of Justice Department policy, training, and the law.

    Part Two recounted defense questioning of an FBI agent, who confirmed more than one law enforcement officer was being investigated for corruption, that “the information first surfaced in 2004,” and that another special agent had been assigned to the case in 2009, something the defense was not aware of and that might have prompted them to file for a continuance.

    In Part Three, the new agent assigned to the law enforcement corruption investigation was located and called to the stand. Essentially, the subject of the investigation was not cleared, but not prosecuted either, and assigned to work with the Southwest Border Task Force. The agent also affirmed he believed the suspect law enforcement officer had been tipped off.

    Part Four records the defense questioning of Deputy Sheriff Allen Batts, who denied knowing he was under investigation and couldn’t recall and denied when asked about reporting a colleague to the FBI. The one thing he said he was certain about was that he was not biased when he testified in the Reese trial, claiming “he raised his right hand and told the truth.”

    Part Five is the powerful, must-read summation, showing how the detective’s testimony contradicts that given by the FBI agents, how he said he could not recall things that have been established, how he continues to have a "fear motive, and how the case against the Reese family was based on the jury accepting his word – and specific details he evidently had no difficulty recalling -- over that of Terri Reese, the one the evidence-withholding U.S. Attorney portrayed as being the liar.

    The ordeal of the Reese family continues as a growing sense emerges among those watching the convolutions and misrepresentations and evidence of corruption at all levels -- a suspicion among some and a certainty among others -- that the wrong people have been put on trial, and that their scapegoating is being continued lest the entire official web of deceit unravels.

    http://www.examiner.com/article/hear...ption-gun-case

  2. #2
    Centurion
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Yuma, Arizona, USA
    Posts
    923

    If you want details, the links to the Luna County Tea Party reporting are invaluable

    This corrupt abuse of the Reese family would never have been exposed except for the citizen reporting done by the Luna County Tea Party from the courtroom.

    The persecution of the Reese family has been Stalinesque. The whole family held in jail for months without bail. All of their assets siezed so that they could not hire a lawyer. Multiple nonsense charges brought to bear to pressure for a plea bargain (most of them thrown out by the judge at trial.

    Now we learn that a major witness against them was under investigation for years, by the people that had him testify, and this fact was not made available for the Reese defense.

    This sort of thing could happen to any of us.

  3. #3
    Regular Member OC for ME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    White Oak Plantation
    Posts
    12,272
    In today's political climate it is odd that a gun dealer would not video (with audio) record every firearms transaction.

    The Reeses' are clearly being railroaded. I hope the judge does the obvious right thing. What would be even better is to remand that thug cop to the custody of the bailiff and officially sanction those prosecutors and anyone else who perpetuated this travesty against justice. If the Reeses' prevail this taxpayer will not bat an eye at a large civil payout to the Reeses'.
    "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson.

    "Better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer" - English jurist William Blackstone.
    It is AFAIK original to me. Compromise is failure on the installment plan, particularly when dealing with so intractable an opponent as ignorance. - Nightmare

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •