Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Anti News Anchor gets Owned by Keith Morgan

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Battle Creek, ,
    Posts
    559

    Thumbs up Anti News Anchor gets Owned by Keith Morgan

    Oh this is good, take notes for your next encounter... Anti-Gun Liberal News Anchor Destroyed in Interview w/ Keith Morgan


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQYCX...ayer_embedded#!

  2. #2
    Regular Member mtbinva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Mount Nebo, WV
    Posts
    82
    Quote Originally Posted by Sheldon View Post
    Oh this is good, take notes for your next encounter... Anti-Gun Liberal News Anchor Destroyed in Interview w/ Keith Morgan


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQYCX...ayer_embedded#!
    WOW, that reporter is an idiot. No facts, no rationalization, just a glory getting self righteous idiot trying to get an upper hand in a subject the only facts hes armed with is the bull$h!t liberal rhetoric.

    Keith Morgan CRUSHED this idiot. We need more of this in the media.
    Chance favors only the prepared mind.

    Louis Pasteur


  3. #3
    Regular Member sharkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,066
    I wish he didn't bring up machine guns though.
    "Public opinion and votes have nothing to do with this. The challenge of the Court is not what they're going to do with votes. The challenge-- of the Court is are they going to protect people's rights." - Al Sharpton


  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Fairborn, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    13,063

    Anti News Anchor gets Owned by Keith Morgan

    I don't see the reporter as an idiot. He is just misinformed and is reacting irrationally, thinking it is rational.

    He does illustrate why we make our argument look foolish and his look rational when we argue about owning nukes and grenade launchers. Stop mentioning weapons like them and defuse his argument!

    An interesting point about fully automatics in the black market. Ban semi-autos, and the black market will flourish, not just with semi-autos, but with full-autos. In for a penny, in for a pound!

    A good debate on both sides. Rationality was with the pro-2A side.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

    <o>

  5. #5
    Regular Member linerider69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Louisburg
    Posts
    84
    WE need more debates that show just how irrational the whole gun argument is makes me sick that the media offers no real data to support their ideas when the other side does.CAN THESE PEOPLE READ AND SEE HOW IDIOTIC THEY LOOK report on something that makes a difference.Several people have died from drinking Monster energy drink where is Obama and the media lets ban monster.Or ban those annoying scooters that are on 55mpr roads that are traveling 30mph I'm sure there are some statistics that can be shuffled around to make them seem like they are death traps.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Battle Creek, ,
    Posts
    559

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    Keith was still calling guns "assault weapons" .. other than that he did OK

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slidell, Louisiana
    Posts
    2,464
    Quote Originally Posted by eye95 View Post
    I don't see the reporter as an idiot. He is just misinformed and is reacting irrationally, thinking it is rational.

    He does illustrate why we make our argument look foolish and his look rational when we argue about owning nukes and grenade launchers. Stop mentioning weapons like them and defuse his argument!

    SNIP
    The reporter brought up nukes. Others in the anti movement do it often to take the "arms the same as the military" argument to its extreme. It is a simple argument to defend. The constitution has provisions for an amendment process. It does because the framers new they couldn't think of everything. Of course it takes more than a majority of congress or the people to be successfully amended but, it would be hard to believe that a "no nukes" clause could not be added to the 2A. So the defense to "does the 2A protect the right to own nukes" argument is... it should be amended to allow nuke regulation.

    Keith did very well though. Certainly a much better spokesman than others we've seen lately.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •